Rosily Stanly v. M.G.Rajamanikkam

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.SURENDRA MOHAN WEDNESDAY, THE 24TH DAY OF JUNE 2015/3RD ASHADHA, 1937 Con.Case(C).No. 606 of 2015 (S) IN WP(C).18896/2014 ----------------------------------------------------- AGAINST THE JUDGMENT IN WP(C) 18896/2014 DATED 13-11-2014 PETITIONER:

--------------- ROSILY STANLY AGED 71 YEARS W/O.STANLY, PUTHENVEETIL HOUSE, MEENCHIRA ROAD PONEKKARA, ELAMAKKARA P.O., EDAPPALLY COCHIN-26.

BY ADVS.SRI.K.JANARDHANAN SRI.K.J.MANU RAJ RESPONDENT(S):

-----------------

1. M.G.RAJAMANIKKAM (FATHER'S NAME AND AGE NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER) THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, COLLECTORATE, KAKKANAD ERNAKULAM, PIN-682030.

2. THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER (NAME NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER) NATIONAL HIGHWAY BRIDGE DIVISION KODUNGALLUR-680664.

R2 BY ADV. GOVERNMENT PLEADER SHRI.M.K.ABOOBACKER THIS CONTEMPT OF COURT CASE (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 24-06-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

JJ

K. SURENDRA MOHAN, J.

------------------------------- Cont. Case NO.606 OF 2015 ---------------------------------- Dated this the 24th June, 2015.

JUDGMENT

An affidavit has been filed by the second respondent reporting compliance with the direction of this Court. According to the counsel for the petitioner, there is some difference in the amount claimed by the petitioner and the amount actually paid. The petitioner shall be at liberty to work out her remedies in respect to the difference in amount referred to above. Since the direction of this Court has already been complied with this contempt case is closed. Sd/- K. SURENDRA MOHAN Judge jj /True copy/