Mercy Joseph v. Sri.Ajith Patil

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE MONDAY, THE 15TH DAY OF JUNE 2015/25TH JYAISHTA, 1937 Con.Case(C).No. 636 of 2015 (S) IN WP(C).10651/2014 ----------------------------------------------------- AGAINST THE ORDER/JUDGMENT IN WP(C) 10651/2014 of HIGH COURT OF KERALA DATED 29-01-2015.

PETITIONER/PETITIONER:

--------------------- MERCY JOSEPH, W/O SHANAWARKHAN, AGE 57 YEARS ACCOUNTS OFFICER (RETD), BANGALAVIL CONTINENTAL GARDENS, VATIYOORKAVU P.O.

THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695 013.

BY ADV. SRI.ROY CHACKO RESPONDENT(S)/RESPONDENT:

------------------------ SRI.AJITH PATIL AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS (FATHER'S NAME NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER) MANAGING DIRECTOR, KERALA WATER AUTHROITY VIKAS BHAVAN, VELLAYAMBALAM THIRUVANANTHAPURAM -695033.

R BY SRI.JOSEPH JOHN, SC, KERALA WATER AUTHORITY THIS CONTEMPT OF COURT CASE (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 15-06-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

COC NO.636/2015 APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS:

ANNEXURE A1 - COPY OF JUDGMENT IN WP(C) NO.10651/2014 DATED 29.01.2015.

ANNEXURE A2 - COPY OF THE COVERING LETTER DATED 24.02.2015 SENT BY THE PETITIONER TO THE RESPONDENT ANNEXURE A3 - COPY OF THE ARTICLE TRACKING DOCUMENT. RESPONDENT'(S) EXHIBITS: NIL // TRUE COPY// P A TO JUDGE sm/

A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE, J.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - C.O.(C) No. 636 of 2015 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Dated this the 15th day of June, 2015

JUDGMENT

The learned counsel for the petitioner has produced before me for perusal proceedings of the Chief Engineer (HRD & GL), Kerala Water Authority No. KWA/JB/E.2(B)/1146/2012, dated 06.06.2015 declaring probation of the petitioner with a rider that "subject to ratification by the Government". It is also seen that another order No. KWA/JB/E2(b)/313/2014 of the Managing Director has been passed on same day in compliance of the directions in the judgment . The right of the petitioner, if any, is affected in future, he is at liberty to challenge the rider in the appropriate proceedings. In view of compliance, the Contempt of Court Case is closed.

A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE JUDGE sm/