← Library
High Court of KeralaCon.Case(C)/640/2015closed

K.V.Rajendran v. R.Rajasekharan Nair

2015-09-09Honourable Mr.Justice P.R.Ramachandra Menon3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P.R.RAMACHANDRA MENON WEDNESDAY, THE 9TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2015/18TH BHADRA, 1937 Con.Case(C).No. 640 of 2015 (S) IN WP(C).16578/2011 ----------------------------------------------------- AGAINST THE ORDER/JUDGMENT IN WP(C) 16578/2011 of HIGH COURT OF KERALA DATED 14.08.2014 PETITIONER(S)/PETITIONER:

------------------------ K.V.RAJENDRAN AGED 68 YEARS S/O.LATE T V VASUDEVAN, 'PRANAVAM'

NEAR SUBRAMANIAN TEMPLE, CHEVAYOOR P O KOZHIKODE 673017 BY ADV. SRI.M.P.PRAKASH RESPONDENT(S)/RESPONDENTS:

--------------------------

1. R.RAJASEKHARAN NAIR SECRETARY, KERALA STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD VYDHUTHIBHAVAN, PATTAM, THIRUVANANTHAPURAMPIN 695004

2. K DAMODARAN NAMBOODIRI CHIEF INTERNAL AUDITOR KERALA STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD, VYDHUTHIBHAVAN, PATTOM THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695004

3. UNNIKRISHNAN T P EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, ELECTRICAL DIVISION KERALA STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD, VYDHUTHYBHAVAN GANDHI ROAD, KOZHIKODE 673011 R1-R3 BY ADV. SRI.P.SANTHALINGAM (SR.) R1-R3 BY ADV. SRI.S.SHARAN,SC,K.S.E.BOARD BY SRI.K.S.ANIL, SC, KSEB THIS CONTEMPT OF COURT CASE (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 09-09-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

COC NO. 640 OF 2015 APPENDIX PETITIONER'S ANNEXURES :

ANNEXURE I : TRUE COPY OF JUDGMENT IN W.P(C) NO. 16578 OF 2011 ANNEXURE II : TRUE COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION DATED 24.09.2014 OF THE PETITIONER.

ANNEXURE III : TRUE COPY OF THE JUDGMENT IN W.A. 60/2014 ANNEXURE IV : TRUE COPY OF THE LETTER DATED 14.03.2015 OF the PETITIONER.

/TRUE COPY/ P.A. TO JUDGE

P.R. RAMACHANDRA MENON J.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Cont. Case (C) No. 640 of 2015 against W.P.(C) No. 16578 of 2011 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Dated, this the 9th day of September, 2015

JUDGMENT

The learned counsel for the respondents submits that the direction given by this Court as per Annexure I judgment has already been complied with. In the said circumstances, this Court does not find it necessary to proceed with further steps. The contempt matter stands closed, recording the submission as above.

Sd/- P. R. RAMACHANDRA MENON, (JUDGE) kmd