K.S.Surendran v. M.G.Rajamanikkam
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P.R.RAMACHANDRA MENON WEDNESDAY, THE 9TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2015/18TH BHADRA, 1937 Con.Case(C).No. 646 of 2015 (S) IN WP(C).33303/2014 ----------------------------------------------------- AGAINST THE ORDER/JUDGMENT IN WP(C) 33303/2014 of HIGH COURT OF KERALA DATED 16.01.2015 PETITIONER(S)/PETITIONER IN WPC:
--------------------------------- K.S.SURENDRAN AGED 46 YEARS S/O.SUKUMARAN, KALARICKAL PARAMBIL, PUKKAD ELANKUNNAPPUZHA P.O., ELANKUNNAPPUZHA VILLAGE KOCHI TALUK, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT.
BY ADVS.SRI.P.A.RAJESH SMT.POOJA SURENDRAN RESPONDENT(S)/2ND RESPONDENT IN WPC:
------------------------------------- SRI.M.G.RAJAMANIKKAM AGE AND FATHER'S NAME NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER DISTRICT COLLECTOR, CIVIL STATION, KAKKANAD KOCHI, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT - 682 030.
R BY SENIOR GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI.R. PADMARAJ THIS CONTEMPT OF COURT CASE (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 09-09-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
COC NO. 646 OF 2015 APPENDIX PETITIONER'S ANNEXURES :
ANNEXURE A1 :
CERTIFIED COPY OF THE JUDGMENT DATED 16.01.2015 IN W.P. NO. 33303/2014 OF THIS HONOURABLE COURT. ANNEXURE A2 :
TRUE COPY OF THE RECEIPT ACKNOWLEDGING ANNEXURE A1 JUDGMENT.
ANNEXURE A3 :
TRUE COPY OF THE APPLICATION DATED 05.11.2014 SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE RESPODNENT. /TRUE COPY/ P.A. TO JUDGE
P.R. RAMACHANDRA MENON J.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Cont. Case (C) No. 646 of 2015 against W.P.(C) No. 33303 of 2014 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Dated, this the 9th day of September, 2015
JUDGMENT
The learned senior Government Pleader appearing for the respondent submits that the direction given by this Court vide Annexure A1 has been complied with. It is pointed out that after considering the petition preferred by the writ petitioner with reference to Clause 6 of the Kerala Land Utilization Order, an order has been passed on 18.08.2015 enabling the petitioner to make use of the land for other purpose than agriculture.
In the said circumstances, this Court finds that nothing further remains to be considered in this contempt matter. The contempt matter is closed, recording the submission as aforesaid. Sd/- P. R. RAMACHANDRA MENON, (JUDGE) kmd