Regi.S v. Mrs.Tessy M.V

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.V.RAMAKRISHNA PILLAI TUESDAY, THE 16TH DAY OF JUNE 2015/26TH JYAISHTA, 1937 Con.Case(C).No. 677 of 2015 (S) ----------------------------------- WP(C) 28360/2012 of THIS HONOURABLE COURT -------------- PETITIONER/PETITIONER :

------------------------------------ REGI.S., AGED 34 YEARS, W/O AJITH KUMAR, VALIYAVEETTIL VADAKKATHIL, POOZHIKKAD, KUDASSANAD P.O, PANDALAM PATHANAMTHITTA DISTRICT PIN 689 512 (NOW WORKING IS PHYSICAL EDUCATION TEACHER SNDP HIGHER SECONDARY SCHOOL UDAYEMPERORE, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT BY ADVS.DR.K.P.SATHEESAN (SR.) SRI.P.MOHANDAS (ERNAKULAM) SRI.ANOOP.V.NAIR SRI.S.VIBHEESHANAN SRI.N.MANU THAMPI RESPONDENT :

-------------------- MRS.TESSY M.V (HUSBAND'S NAME NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER) DISTRICT EDUCATIONAL OFFICER, PATHANAMTHITTA 689 001 BY SPL. GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI. JOSE KALIATH THIS CONTEMPT OF COURT CASE (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 16-06-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

bp

Con.Case(C).No. 677 of 2015 (S) APPENDIX PETITIONER'S ANNEXURES :

ANNEXURE I: COPY OF THE JUDGMENT DT 20/6/2014 IN WPC NO. 28360/2012. ANNEXURE II: COPY OF THE ORDER ISSUED BY THE JOINT DIRECTOR OF GENERAL EDUCATION DT 23/10/2014.

ANNEXURE III: COPY OF THE LETTER ISSUED BY THE JOINT DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTIONS TO THE RESPONDENT DT 28/1/2015.

RESPONDENT'S ANNEXURES :

NIL.

//TRUE COPY// P.A. TO JUDGE bp

A.V. RAMAKRISHNA PILLAI, J.

------------------------------------- C.C.(C) No. 677 of 2015 -------------------------------------- Dated this the 15th day of June, 2015.

JUDGMENT

Today, when the matter came up for hearing, the learned Senior Government Pleader on instructions submitted that the bill has been countersigned by the concerned official and the same has been placed before the authority concerned on 10.6.2015. As there is substantial compliance, the contempt petition is closed.

If the petitioner has any subsisting grievance against any other respondents regarding non-implementation of the judgment, it shall be open to the petitioner to initiate separate contempt against such respondent.

Sd/- A.V. RAMAKRISHNA PILLAI JUDGE

-2Scl.