High Court of KeralaCon.Case(C)/690/2015closed

Ward Iii, Swajaladhara Sudhajala Upabhokthru Samithi v. M.G.Rajamanickam Ias

2015-09-03Honourable Mr.Justice A.M.Shaffique,Honourable The Chief Justice Mr.Ashok Bhushan2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR.ASHOK BHUSHAN & THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE A.M.SHAFFIQUE THURSDAY, THE 3RD DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2015/12TH BHADRA, 1937 Con.Case(C).No. 690 of 2015 (S) IN WP(C).8531/2015 ---------------------------------------------------- JUDGMENT IN WP(C) 8531/2015 DATED 08-04-2015 -------------- PETITIONERS/PETITIONERS IN WPC NO 8531/2015 :- ------------------------------------------------

1. WARD III, SWAJALADHARA SUDHAJALA UPABHOKTHRU SAMITHI (REG NO E.R.239/03), SANKARANKUZHY, THABORE P O ERNAKULAM DISTRICT, PIN - 683 577 REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, M.D.JAIMES

2. M D JAMES, AGED 42 YEARS S/O.DEVASWY, MADASSERY HOUSE, SANKARANKUZHY THABORE P.O., ERNAKULAM DISTRICT, PIN - 683 577.

3. JIMMY JOSEPH, AGED 44 YEARS S/O.JOSEPH, PALATTY HOUSE, SANKARANKUZHY THABORE P.O., ERNAKULAM DISTRICT, PIN - 683 577. BY ADV. SRI.K.ABDUL JAWAD RESPONDENTS/3RD AND 8TH RESPONDENTS IN W.P.(C)No.8531/2015 :- --------------------------------------------------------------

1. M.G.RAJAMANICKAM IAS, AGE AND FATHER'S NAME NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONERS, THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, COLLECTORATE KAKKANAD, ERNAKULAM.

2. K.V.JOHNY, AGE AND FATHER'S NAME NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONERS, THE SECRETARY, MOOKKANNUR GRAMA PANCHAYATH, MOOKKANNUR P.O, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT, PIN - 683 577. R1 BY SR.GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI.P.I.DAVIS BY SRI. G.BIJU BY SRI. M.RAJENDRAN NAIR THIS CONTEMPT OF COURT CASE (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 03-09-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

jvt

ASHOK BHUSHAN, C.J & A.M. SHAFFIQUE, J.

-------------------------------------------- Cont. Case (C) No.690 of 2015 -------------------------------------------- Dated this the 3rd day of September 2015

J U D G M E N T

Ashok Bhushan, CJ.

Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the order, against which non compliance is complained of, has already been complied with and the quarrying operations have been closed and that the petitioners do not intend to proceed with this contempt case and the same may be closed.

Recording the above submission made by the learned counsel for the petitioners, this contempt case is closed. Sd/- ASHOK BHUSHAN CHIEF JUSTICE Sd/- A.M. SHAFFIQUE J UDGE //TRUE COPY// P.A. TO JUDGE Jvt