K S Thankachan v. Regeeshkumar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR.ASHOK BHUSHAN & THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE A.M.SHAFFIQUE THURSDAY, THE 28TH DAY OF MAY 2015/7TH JYAISHTA, 1937 Con.Case(C).No. 710 of 2015 (S) ---------------------------------------------- AGAINST THE JUDGMENT IN WP.(C) NO.11862/2015 DATED 09/04/2015. ......

PETITIONER:

------------------ K.S. THANKACHAN, AGED 72 YEARS, S/O.SAMUELKUTTY, S.R. BUNGALOW, PULLIKANAKKUMURI, KRISHNAPURAM VILLAGE, KAYAMKULAM, KARTHIKAPPALLY, ALAPPUZHA.

BY ADV. SRI.R.RAJASEKHARAN PILLAI.

RESPONDENT:

----------------------- D. REJEESHKUMAR, AGE AND FATHER'S NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER, SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, KAYAMKULAM-690 502.

BY SPL. GOVT. PLEADER SMT.GIRIJA GOPAL.

THIS CONTEMPT OF COURT CASE (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 28-05-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: rs.

Con.Case(C).No. 710 of 2015 (S) APPENDIX PETITIONERS' ANNEXURES:

ANNEXURE I COPY OF THE JUDGMENT DATED 09/04/2015 IN WP.(C) NO. 11862/2015 OF THIS HON'BLE COURT.

ANNEXURE 2 COPY OF THE INTERIM ORDER IN I.A. NO.1465/2015 IN OS. NO.226/2015 OF MUNSIFF COURT, KAYAMKULAM. ANNEXURE 3 COPY OF THE WRITTEN COMPLAINT DATED 10/05/2015 MADE BY THE PETITIONER TO THE RESPONDENT.

RESPONDENTS' ANNEXURES:

NIL.

//TRUE COPY// P.A. TO JUDGE rs.

ASHOK BHUSHAN, CJ & A.M.SHAFFIQUE, J.

* * * * * * * * * * * * * Cont.Case No.710 of 2015 ---------------------------------------- Dated this the 28th day of May 2015

J U D G M E N T

Ashok Bhushan, CJ This contempt case has been filed alleging non-compliance of the judgment dated 09/04/2015 passed by this Court in W.P.C.No.11862/2015. The writ petition was filed seeking police protection.

2.

We have noted in the first paragraph of the judgment that since the allegations in the writ petition discloses a family dispute, police cannot interfere in the said dispute. However, in the concluding paragraph, we observed that the 3rd respondent should keep constant vigil on the activities of both petitioner as well as respondents 4 and 5. On the allegation made in the contempt petition, we do not think that any contempt is made out so as to entertain this contempt case.

This contempt case is closed.

(sd/-) (ASHOK BHUSHAN, CHIEF JUSTICE) (sd/-) (A.M.SHAFFIQUE, JUDGE) jsr