High Court of KeralaCon.Case(C)/746/2015closed

P.P.Joseph v. M.Moidunnikutty

2015-07-20Honourable Mr. Justice A.V.Ramakrishna Pillai3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.V.RAMAKRISHNA PILLAI MONDAY, THE 20TH DAY OF JULY 2015/29TH ASHADHA, 1937 CON.CASE(C).NO. 746 OF 2015 (S) [IN RELATION TO THE JUDGMENT DATED 10-04-2015 IN W.P(C).NO.27525/2013 OF THIS HON'BLE COURT] .......

PETITIONER/PETITIONER IN W.P.(C)NO.27525 OF 2013: P.P.JOSEPH, AGED 46 YEARS S/O.PUNNOOSE, POOCHAKKATTIL HOUSE, BRAHMAMANGALAM P.O., CHEMBU VILLAGE, VAIKOM TALUK, KOTTAYAM DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.JOBI JOSE KONDODY.

RESPONDENT/RESPONDENT NO.2 IN W.P.(C)NO.27525 OF 2013: M.MOIDUNNIKUTTY, AGE AND FATHER'S NAME NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER, THE SECRETARY, CHEMBU GRAMA PANCHAYAT, BRAHMAMANGALAM P.O., VAIKOM TALUK, KOTTAYAM DISTRICT - 686 614.

BY ADVS.SRI.V.G.ARUN, SRI.T.R.HARIKUMAR.

THIS CONTEMPT OF COURT CASE (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 20-07-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

Prv/2.

CON.CASE(C).NO. 746 OF 2015 (S) APPENDIX PETITIONER'S ANNEXURES:

ANNEXURE A1:

A TRUE CERTIFIED COPY OF THE JUDGMENT DATED 10.04.2015 IN W.P.(C).NO.27525 OF 2013 PASSED BY THE LEARNED SINGLE JUDGE OF THIS HON'BLE COURT.

ANNEXURE A2:

A TRUE COPY OF THE RECEIPT ACKNOWLEDGING RECEIPT OF ANNEXURE-A1 JUDGMENT ON 22.04.2015 BY THE FIRST RESPONDENT.

RESPONDENTS' ANNEXURES:

ANNEXURE R1(A):

A TRUE COPY OF THE RESOLUTION NO.IX (1) DATED 18.06.2015 OF THE PANCHAYAT COMMITTEE.

ANNEXURE R1(B):

A TRUE COPY OF THE RESOLUTION NO.6(1) DATED 08.07.2015 OF THE PANCHAYAT COMMITTEE.

//TRUE COPY// P.A. TO JUDGE.

Prv/2.

A.V. RAMAKRISHNA PILLAI, J.

------------------------------------- C.C.(C) No.746 of 2015 in W.P.(C) No.27525 of 2013 -------------------------------------- Dated this the 20th day of July, 2015.

JUDGMENT

Today, when the matter came up for hearing, the learned Standing Counsel for the respondent panchayat would submit the respondent panchayat has disposed of the appeal. An affidavit stating the same has been filed along with Ext.R1(b), which is a copy of the resolution.

Therefore, the contempt of court case is closed reserving the right of the petitioner to challenge Ext.R1(b), if he is aggrieved.

Sd/- A.V. RAMAKRISHNA PILLAI JUDGE Scl.