K.V.Muraleedharan v. Dr.P.L.Puniya

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P.R.RAMACHANDRA MENON WEDNESDAY, THE 5TH DAY OF AUGUST 2015/14TH SRAVANA, 1937 Con.Case(C).No. 796 of 2015 (S) IN WP(C).30055/2014 ----------------------------------------------------- AGAINST THE ORDER/JUDGMENT IN WP(C) 30055/2014 of HIGH COURT OF KERALA DATED 04-02-2015 PETITIONER(S):

-------------- K.V.MURALEEDHARAN AGED 50 YEARS S/O VELAYUDHAN, MANNUTHI, OLLUKARA VILLAGE THRISSUR.

BY ADV. SRI.L.RAJESH NARAYAN RESPONDENT(S):

-------------- DR.P.L.PUNIYA AGE NOT KNOWN, FATHERS NAME NOT KNOWN, CHAIRMAN NATIONAL COMMISSION FOR SCHEDULED CASTES GOVERNMENT OF INDIA, FLOOR VTH, LOKNAYAK BHAVAN KHAN MARKET, NEW DELHI-110 003.

R BY SRI.N.NAGARESH, ASSISTANT SOLICITOR GENERAL BY ADV. SMT.C.G.PREETHA, CGC THIS CONTEMPT OF COURT CASE (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 05-08-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

P.R. RAMACHANDRA MENON J.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Cont. Case No. 796 of 2015 against W.P.(C) No. 30055 of 2014 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Dated, this the 5th day of August, 2015

JUDGMENT

The learned standing counsel for the respondent Board submits that the direction given by this Court as per Annexure A judgment dated 04.02.2015 in W.P.(C) No. 30055 of 2015 has been complied with by passing an order on 28.06.2015.

2. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that though an order has been passed, it is not in full compliance with the direction given by this Court.

3. This Court finds that the direction contained in the judgment was only to consider and pass appropriate orders on Ext. P1. If the order is detrimental to the rights and interest of the petitioner, it is open for him to challenge the same by way of appropriate proceedings in accordance with law. Without prejudice to the rights and liberties of the petitioner in this regard, the contempt matter stands closed.

Sd/- P. R. RAMACHANDRA MENON, (JUDGE) kmd