Shibin.K v. Abdul Majeed

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE TUESDAY, THE 11TH DAY OF AUGUST 2015/20TH SRAVANA, 1937 Con.Case(C).No. 798 of 2015 (S) --------------------------------------------- WP(C) 7309/2015, DATED 09-03-2015 -------------------- PETITIONER(S)/PETITIONER:

---------------------------------------- SHIBIN.K, AGED 29 YEARS, S/O.BALAN, KOYAMPURATH HOUSE, MAKKADA P O, KOKKODI VIA, KOZHIKODE 673611.

BY ADV. SRI.P.C.SASIDHARAN RESPONDENTS/RESPONDENTS:

----------------------------------------------

1. ABDUL MAJEED, (AGE AND FATHER'S NAME NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER) REGISTRAR, UNIVERSITY OF CALICUT, UNIVERSITY CAMPUS, THENHIPALAM, MALAPPURAM 673635

2. ABDUL SALAM, (AGE AND FATHER'S NAME NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER), VICE CHANCELLOR AND CHAIRMAN OF THE SELECTION COMMITTEE, CONSTITUTED FOR SELECTION TO THE POST OF ASSISTANTS IN THE UNIVERISTY OF CALICUT, UNIVERSITY CAMPUS, THENHIPALAM, MALAPPURAM 673635. BY ADV. SRI.SANTHOSH MATHEW,SC THIS CONTEMPT OF COURT CASE (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 11-08-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

PJ

Con.Case(C).No. 798 of 2015 (S) --------------------------------------------- APPENDIX PETITIONERS' ANNEXURES ---------------------------------------- A1:

COPY OF THE INTERIM ORDER IN WPC.7309/15 DATED 9/3/15 A2:

COPY OF THE EXT.P5 IN THE WRIT PETITION A3:

COPY OF THE MEMO DATED 24/2/15 A4:

COPY OF THE COVER EVIDENCING THE POSING OF ANNEXURE A3. RESPONDENTS' ANNEXURES ------------------------------------------- R1(1): COPY OF THE BIO-DATA OF THE 50 CANDIDATES CALLED FOR INTERVIEW ON 10/4/15 INCLUDING THE PETITIONER / TRUE COPY / P.S. TO JUDGE PJ

A. MUHAMED MUSTAQUE, J ------------------------------------------------ Cont. Case (C).No. 798 of 2015 ------------------------------------------------ Dated this the 11th day of August, 2015

JUDGMENT

This contempt case is filed alleging non-compliance of the interim order dated 09.03.2015 in W.P.(C).No.7309 of 2015. It is explained in the affidavit filed by the 1st respondent that the candidates have not been insisted to produce the computer certificates and experience and no marks have been awarded by the Selection Committee. Considering the averments in the affidavit, the contempt case is closed.

Sd/- A. MUHAMED MUSTAQUE, JUDGE bpr