High Court of KeralaCon.Case(C)/827/2015closed

S.I.Lal Sajeev v. Sri.Antony Chacko

2015-07-14Honourable Mr. Justice Dama Seshadri Naidu3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DAMA SESHADRI NAIDU TUESDAY, THE 14TH DAY OF JULY 2015/23RD ASHADHA, 1937 Con.Case(C).No. 827 of 2015 (S) IN WP(C).33041/2014 ----------------------------------------------------- JUDGMENT IN WP(C) 33041/2014 ..................

PETITIONER/PETITIONER:

S.I.LAL SAJEEV, AGED 46 YEARS, S/O.K.SUDHAKARAN, LAL SADANAM, PULINKUDY, MULLOOR P.O., VIZHINJAM, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695 521.(CONDUCTOR KERALA STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM CENTRAL DEPOT) BY ADV. SRI.K.P.JUSTINE (KARIPAT) RESPONDENTS/RESPONDENTS 1 & 2:

1. SRI.ANTONY CHACKO (AGE AND FATHER'S NAME NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER), MANAGING DIRECTOR, THE KERALA STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION, TRANSPORT BHAVAN, FORT P.O., THIRUVANANTHAPURAM - 695 023.

2. SRI. K.M.SREEKUMAR (AGE AND FATHER'S NAME NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER) EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR (ADMINISTRATION), THE KERALA STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION, TRANSPORT BHAVAN, EAST FORT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM - 695 023.

BY ADV. SRI.M.GOPIKRISHNAN NAMBIAR THIS CONTEMPT OF COURT CASE (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 14-07-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

APPENDIX IN COC 827/2015 PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS:

ANNEXURE-A1 TRUE COPY OF JUDGMENT DATED 11.12.2014 IN WPC 33041/2014 OF THIS HONOURABLE COURT ANNEXURE-A2 TRUE COPY OF THE FORWARDING LETTER DATED 23.12.2014 SENT BY THE PETITIONER'S ADVOCATE TO THE RESPONDENTS RESPONDENT'S EXHIBITS:

ANNEXURE R1(a) - NO.VLS4-023921/14 DATED 7.7.2015 /TRUE COPY/ P.S. TO JUDGE

Dama Seshadri Naidu, J.

------------------------------------------- Con.Case(C)No.827 of 2015 S -------------------------------------------- Dated this the 14th day of July, 2015

JUDGMENT

It is reported that the directions in the judgment dated 11.12.2014 in W.P.(C)No.33041/2014 have been complied with. Recording the said submission, this Court closes the contempt case leaving it open for the petitioner to lay challenge against Annexure R1(a), if he desires. Dama Seshadri Naidu, Judge tkv