Sunil Kumar v. District Collector

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.VINOD CHANDRAN TUESDAY, THE 16TH DAY OF JUNE 2015/26TH JYAISHTA, 1937 Con.Case(C).No. 836 of 2015 (S) ------------------------------------------- NON COMPLIANCE OF JUDGMENT DATED 28/04/2015 IN WP(C).NO. 12834/2015. ......

PETITIONER/PETITIONER:

-------------------------------------- SUNIL KUMAR K.C., KIZHEKKE CHALIL, MEDICAL COLLEGE P.O., KOZHIKODE.

BY ADV. SRI.STALIN PETER DAVIS.

RESPONDENTS/RESPONDENTS:

-------------------------------------------------

1. SRI.N. PRASANTH, FATHER'S NAME AND AGE NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER, DISTRICT COLLECTOR AND CHAIRMAN, REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY, KOZHIKODE - 673 001.

2. SRI.P.H. ASARAF, FATHER'S NAME AND AGE NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER, SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE AND MEMBER, REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY, KOZHIKODE - 673 001.

3. SRI.NARAYANAN POTTY S.N., FATHER'S NAME AND AGE NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER, DEPUTY TRANSPORT COMMISSIONER, SOUTH ZONE AND MEMBER, REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY, KOZHIKODE - 673 001.

4. SRI.K. PREMANDAN, FATHER'S NAME AND AGE NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER, SECRETARY, REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY, KOZHIKODE - 673 001.

BY GOVT. PLEADER SRI.BIJU MEENATTOOR.

THIS CONTEMPT OF COURT CASE (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 16-06-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: rs.

Con.Case(C).No. 836 of 2015 (S) APPENDIX PETITIONER'S ANNEXURES:- ANNEXURE A1 COPY OF THE JUDGMENT ON MVAA NO.9/2015 DATED 06/05/2015.

ANNEXURE A2 COPY OF THE JUDGMENT IN WP(C).NO.12834/2015 DATED 28/04/2015.

ANNEXURE A3 COPY OF THE DISRESPECTED AND ILLEGAL ORDER DATED 05/05/2015 OF THE RESPONDENTS AGAINST JUDICIAL DISCIPLINE.

RESPONDENT'S ANNEXURES:- NIL.

//TRUE COPY// P.A. TO JUDGE rs.

K. VINOD CHANDRAN, J.

------------------------------------------ Contempt Case (Civil) No. 836 of 2015 (S) ------------------------------------------ Dated this the 16th day of June, 2015

J U D G M E N T

The petitioner claims that there is no compliance of Ext.A2 judgment. A reading of Ext.A2 judgment would indicate that there is absolutely no direction given therein. The writ petition was closed merely drawing the attention of the authority to the decision in P.M. Thomas v. The Regional Transport Authority & Another - 2004(2) KLJ 451.

No contempt is discernible. The contempt case is closed.

Sd/- K.VINOD CHANDRAN, JUDGE jjj