V.P.Joby v. Yathish Chandra G.H

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.VINOD CHANDRAN WEDNESDAY, THE 23RD DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2015/1ST ASWINA, 1937 Con.Case(C).No. 861 of 2015 (S) IN WP(C).28190/2014 ----------------------------------------------------- AGAINST THE JUDGMENT IN WP(C) 28190/2014 of HIGH COURT OF KERALA DATED 03-03-2015 PETITIONERS/PETITIONERS:-:

------------------------------------------------------

1. V.P.JOBY AGED 36 YEARS S/O.PAPPACHAN, PROPRIETOR VALOOKARAN ELECTRICALS AND SANITARY SHOP, KALADY ERNAKULAM DISTRICT.

2. V.A.BIJU AGED 34 YEARS S/O.ANTONY, PROPRIETOR, POGO MEN'S WEAR KALADY, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT.

BY ADV. DR.GEORGE ABRAHAM RESPONDENTS/RESPONDENTS 4, 1 AND 5 IN WPC:

-------------------------------------------------------------------------

1. YATHISH CHANDRA G.H. (AGE AND FATHER'S NAME NOT KNOWN) SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE (RURAL) OFFICE OF THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, ALUVA.

2. SHAJI K.M. (AGE AND FATHER'S NAME NOT KNOWN) REGIONAL TRANSPORT OFFICER AND SECRETARY REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY ERNAKULAM, KAKKANAD P.O.

3. CHRISPIN SAM (AGE AND FATHER'S NAME NOT KNOWN) CIRCLE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, KALADY.

BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI. A. LOWSY THIS CONTEMPT OF COURT CASE (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 23-09-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

Con.Case(C).No. 861 of 2015 (S) IN WP(C).28190/2014 APPENDIX PETITIONER'S ANNEXURES ANNX.A:

TRUE COPY OF THE MINUTES OF THE MEETING HELD ON 16.09.2014 ANNX.B:

TRUE COPY OF THE JUDGMENT IN W.P.(C) 28190/2014 ANNX.C:

TRUE COPY OF THE COMMUNICATION DATED 4.4.2015 ANNX.D:

TRUE COPY OF RECEIPT ON 17.3.2015 ANNX.E:

TRUE COPY OF THE RECEIPT ISSUED BY THE FIRST RESPONDENT RESPONDENT'S ANNEXURES ANNX.R2(A):

TRUE COPY OF THE DECISION OF THE RTA HELD ON 17.08.2015 //TRUE COPY// P.A. TO JUDGE JJJ

K. VINOD CHANDRAN, J.

------------------------------------------ Contempt of Court Case No. 861 of 2015 (S) ------------------------------------------ Dated this the 23rd day of September, 2015

J U D G M E N T

Since the compliance of the judgment is evident insofar as the order at Annexure R2(a) is issued, the contempt case shall stand closed. However, since the petitioner submits that the order has not been communicated, the respondent shall immediately communicate the order by registered post.

Sd/- K.VINOD CHANDRAN, JUDGE jjj