Abdul Rahiman v. G.Mohanan Nair

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DAMA SESHADRI NAIDU FRIDAY, THE 16TH DAY OF OCTOBER 2015/24TH ASWINA, 1937 Con.Case(C).No. 905 of 2015 (S) IN WP(C).34208/2014 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ AGAINST THE JUDGMENT IN WP(C) 34208/2014 of HIGH COURT OF KERALA DATED 07-01-2015 PETITIONER : - ---------------------- ABDUL RAHIM, AED 54 YEARS, S/O.CHELLAPPA ROWTHER, RESIDING AT HEDGRO, KOPPAM, PALAKKAD-678 001.

BY ADVS.SRI.S.ANANTHAKRISHNAN SRI.N.K.SUBRAMANIAN RESPONDENTS : - --------------------------

1. G.MOHANAN NAIR, AGED 55 YEARS S/O.G.BHASKARA PILLAI, SECRETARY, PALAKKAD MUNICIPALITY, PALAKKAD-678 001 ADDL.R2. GOPAKUMAR, DISTRICT TOWN PLANNER, TOWN PLANNING OFFICE, CIVIL STATION BUILDING, PALAKKAD - 678 001.

(ADDL.R2 IS IMPLEADED AS PER ORDER DATED 03.08.2015 IN IA 11101/15). R2 BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI. A.J. JOSE AEDAIODI R1 BY ADV. SRI.T.C.SURESH MENON THIS CONTEMPT OF COURT CASE (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 16-10-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

Con.Case(C).No. 905 of 2015 (S) IN WP(C).34208/2014 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ APPENDIX PETITIONER'S ANNEXURES :

ANNEXURE A :

COPY OF THE JUDGMENT IN W.P. No. 34208 OF 2014 DATED 7.1.2014.

ANNEXURE B :

COPY OF THE LETTER DATED 29.1.2015 SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER TO THE RESPONDENT.

RESPONDENTS' ANNEXURES :

ANNEXURE R2(a) :

COPY OF THE LETTER DATED 21.05.2015 WITH TRANSLATION.

ANNEXURE R2(b) :

COPY OF THE REPLY LETTER DATED 25.06.2015 WITH TRANSLATION.

// TRUE COPY // P.A. TO JUDGE DMR/-

DAMA SESHADRI NAIDU, J.

--------------------------------------- Contempt Case (c) No. 905 of 2015 ---------------------------------------- Dated this the 16th day of October, 2015

JUDGMENT

This Contempt case is closed, leaving it open to the petitioner to lay challenge, if it is permissible, the order dated 30.06.2015, which is passed in compliance with Annexure A judgment and which is said to have been served on the learned counsel for the contempt petitioner today. DAMA SESHADRI NAIDU JUDGE DMR/-