Laila v. P.Vijayan

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.V.RAMAKRISHNA PILLAI TUESDAY, THE 28TH DAY OF JULY 2015/6TH SRAVANA, 1937 Con.Case(C).No. 923 of 2015 (S) (JUDGMENT DATED 07/07/2014 OF HIGH COURT OF KERALA IN WP(C) NO.7519/2014 ) PETITIONER(S)/PETITIONER IN WPC:

------------------------------------------------------ LAILA, AGED 48 YEARS, W/O.SURESH BABU, SIJO NIVAS, NETHAJI NAGAR 29, PUNTHALATHAZHAM, KOLLAM, PIN 691030.

BY ADVS.SRI.VAKKOM N.VIJAYAN SMT.V.RENJU RESPONDENT(S)/1ST RESPONDENT IN WP:

---------------------------------------------------------------------- P.VIJAYAN, AGE AND FATHER'S NAME NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER, SECRETARY, KOLLAM CORPORATION RESIDING AT NEAR T.M. VARGHEESE LIBRARY, NEAR WEST POLICE STATION, KACHARY PO, KOLLAM PIN 691001.

BY ADV. SRI.M.K.CHANDRA MOHAN DAS,SC,KOLLAM MPT THIS CONTEMPT OF COURT CASE (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 28-07-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

vmr.

Con.Case(C).No. 923 of 2015 (S) APPENDIX PETITIONER'S ANNEXURES :

--------------------------------------- ANNEXURE A1- CERTIFIED COPY OF THE JUDGMENT DATED 07/07/2014 OF THIS HONOURABLE HIGH COURT OF KERALA.

ANNEXURE A2- TRUE COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION DATED 21/05/2015 SUBMITTED BEFORE THE RESPONDENT.

ANNEXURE A3- TRUE COPY OF THE RECEIPT DATED 21/05/2015. RESPONDENTS ANNEXURES:

---------------------------------------- ANNEXURE A - COPY OF JUDGMENT DATED 08/06/2015 WP(C) 13403/15. /TRUE COPY/ P.S.TO JUDGE vmr.

A.V. RAMAKRISHNA PILLAI, J.

Cont. Case (C) No. 923 of 2015 in W.P.(C) No. 7519 of 2014 Dated this the 28th day of July, 2015

J U D G M E N T

The learned Standing Counsel for the respondent corporation would submit that because of the judgment produced along with the counter affidavit as Annexure A, the respondent corporation is not in a position to complete the actions already initiated on the basis of the directions contained in the judgment dated 07.07.2014. As per Annexure A judgment, time was granted to the respondent to consider Ext.P8 in that case after collecting a report from the PWD. Therefore, the learned Standing Counsel would submit that it would take some more time.

Recording the said submission, the contempt case is closed reserving the right of the petitioner to approach this Court if the judgment of this Court dated 07.07.2014 in WP(C) No.7519/2014 is not complied with by the respondent corporation.

Sd/- A.V. RAMAKRISHNA PILLAI JUDGE bka/-