Shibu P.V. v. Shri. Antony Chacko

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V.CHITAMBARESH MONDAY, THE 6TH DAY OF JULY 2015/15TH ASHADHA, 1937 Con.Case(C).No. 926 of 2015 (S) IN W.P.(C).NO. 6343/2015 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ AGAINST THE JUDGMENT IN WP(C) 6343/2015 of HIGH COURT OF KERALA DATED 27-02-2015 ........................................................ PETITIONER/PETITIONER IN W.P.(C):

------------------------------------------------------- SHIBU P.V., S/O. LATE KUNJAPPA NAIR, AGED 42 YEARS, WORKING AS EMPANELLED CONDUCTOR KSRTC, KANNUR AND RESIDING AT THEERTHAMPADICKACHAL ULIYIL P.O., (VIA), MATTANNOOR, KANNUR DISTRICT - 670 702 BY ADV. SRI.N.UNNIKRISHNAN RESPONDENT/RESPONDENT NO.2 IN THE W.P.(C). :

--------------------------------------------------------------------------- SHRI. ANTONY CHACKO S/O. M.A. CHACKO, AGED 52 YEARS RESIDING AT ETTUKKETTIL HOUSE, CHATHANAD P.O., ALAPPUZHA DISTRICT AND WORKING AS CHAIRMAN AND MANAGING DIRECTOR, KERALA STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION, TRANSPORT BHAVAN, FORT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM - 695 023 BY SRI.M.GOPIKRISHNAN NAMBIAR, SC, KSRTC THIS CONTEMPT OF COURT CASE (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 06-07-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

Con.Case(C).No. 926 of 2015 (S) APPENDIX PETITIONER(S)' ANNEXURES:- -------------------------------------------- ANNEXURE 1 :

A COPY OF JUDGMENT DATED 27.02.2015 IN W.P.(C). NO. 6343/2015 ANNEXURE 2 :

A TRUE COPY OF THE LETTER DATED 27.02.2015 BY THE COUNSEL FOR THE PETITIONER ADDRESSED TO RESPONDENT ANNEXURE 3 :

A COPY OF THE REMINDER NOTICE, SPEED POST WITH A/D DATED 30.05.2015 ADDRESSED TO THE RESPONDENT RESPONDENT(S)' ANNEXURE:- --------------------------------------------- ANNEXURE R1(a) :

ORDER NO. PL.16/014915/12 DATED 2.06.2015 /TRUE COPY/ P.A. TO JUDGE

V. CHITAMBARESH, J --------------------------------------- Cont. of Court Case (C). No. 926 OF 2015 ---------------------------------------- Dated this the 6th day of July, 2015

JUDGMENT

Annexure R1(a) order reflects that the petitioner had completed ten years of service as on 22.12.2011. Annexure R1(a) order further reveals that the services of the petitioner have been regularised.

2.

The petitioner laments that the details of regularisation are absent in R1(a) order. All those details will be present in the appointment order to be followed. No case for pursuing the contempt of court case exists. The contempt of court case is closed.

V. CHITAMBARESH JUDGE