← Library
High Court of KeralaCon.Case(C)/944/2015closed

P.Viswanathan v. Antony Chacko

2015-07-13Honourable Mr.Justice V.Chitambaresh3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V.CHITAMBARESH MONDAY, THE 13TH DAY OF JULY 2015/22ND ASHADHA, 1937 Con.Case(C).No. 944 of 2015 (S) IN W.P.(C).NO. 30/2015 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- AGAINST THE JUDGMENT IN W.P.(C).NO. 30/2015 of HIGH COURT OF KERALA DATED 06-01-2015 ...................................................... PETITIONER/PETITIONER IN THE W.P(C) :

--------------------------------------------------------------- P.VISWANATHAN AGED 47 YEARS S/O. LATE SANKARAN NAMBIAR ASWATHY, POST POYILOOR VIA THUVAKUNNU KANNUR - 670 693 BY ADV. SMT.C.G.PREETHA RESPONDENT: 2ND RESPONDENT IN THE W.P.(C):

-------------------------------------------------------------------------- ANTONY CHACKO AGE NOT KNOWN FATHER'S NAME NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER THE CHAIRMAN AND MANAGING DIRECTOR KSRTC TRANSPORT BHAVAN EAST FORT, THRIUVANANTHAPURAM 695 023 BY ADV. SRI.M.GOPIKRISHNAN NAMBIAR, SC, KSRTC THIS CONTEMPT OF COURT CASE (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 13-07-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

Con.Case(C).No. 944 of 2015 (S) IN W.P.(C).30/2015 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- APPENDIX PETITIONER(S)' ANNEXURES :

--------------------------------------------- ANNEXURE A1:

CERTIFIED COPY OF THE JUDGMENT DATED 06.1.2015 WPC 30 OF 2015 PASSED BY THIS HONOURABLE COURT ANNEXURE A2:

A TRUE COPY OF THE MEMORANDUM DATED 23.3.2015 ISSUED FROM THE OFFICE OF THE 2ND RESPONDENT RESPONDENT(S)' ANNEXURES:-NIL ----------------------------------------------- /TRUE COPY/ P.A. TO JUDGE

V. CHITAMBARESH, J --------------------------------------- Cont. of Court Case (C). No. 944 OF 2015 ---------------------------------------- Dated this the 13th day of July, 2015

JUDGMENT

The directions in the judgment have been complied with. The consequential orders are however open to challenge.

The contempt of court case is closed.

V. CHITAMBARESH JUDGE