Dr.Thomas Philip v. Patil Ajith Bhagwat Rao
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DAMA SESHADRI NAIDU MONDAY, THE 14TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2015/23RD BHADRA, 1937 Con.Case(C).No. 953 of 2015 (S) IN WP(C).32166/2014 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- JUDGMENT IN WP(C) 32166/2014 ................
PETITIONER/PETITIONER:
DR.THOMAS PHILIP AGED 63 YEARS, S/O.P PHILIP, RESIDING AT 10A, DOVER COURT APARTMENTS, SREEKANDATH ROAD, REVIPURAM, ERNAKULAM - 682016.
BY ADVS.SRI.PUSHPARAJAN KODOTH SRI.K.JAYESH MOHANKUMAR SMT.VANDANA MENON RESPONDENTS/RESPONDENTS :
1. PATIL AJITH BHAGWAT RAO, AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS, AND FATHER'S NAME NOT KNOWN, CORPORATION SECRETARY, CORPORATION OF COCHIN, PARK AVENUE ROAD, ERNAKULAM, COCHIN.
2. N.ASHOKAN, AGE AND FATHER'S NAME NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER, EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, MATHER PROJECTS PRIVATE LIMITED, KODIYAT CHAMBERS, RAJAJI ROAD, ERNAKULAM, COCHIN-35.
R1 BY ADV. SRI.K.ANAND, SC, COCHIN CORPN.
R2 BY ADV. SRI.GEORGE ABRAHAM PACHAYIL R BY SRI.P.K.SOYUZ,SC,COCHIN CORPORATION THIS CONTEMPT OF COURT CASE (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 14-09-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
APPENDIX IN COC 953/2015 PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS:
ANNEXURE-A TRUE COPY OF THE JUDGMENT IN WPC 32166/2014 DATED 17.3.2015 ON THE FILE OF THIS HON'BLE COURT ANNEXURE-B TRUE COPY OF THE LETTER DATED 18.6.2015 ISSUED BY THE SECOND RESPONDENT RESPONDENT'S EXHIBITS:
ANNEXURE-R1A LETTER SENT TO THE FIRST RESPONDENT, CORPORATION OF COCHIN BY THE SECOND RESPONDENT, SEEKING THEIR ASSISTANCE AND SUPERVISION TO EXECUTE THE WORK ANNEXURE-R1B REMINDER SENT TO THE FIRST RESPONDENT BY THE SECOND RESPONDENT /TRUE COPY/ P.S. TO JUDGE
Dama Seshadri Naidu, J.
------------------------------------------- Con. Case (C)No.953 of 2015 S -------------------------------------------- Dated this the 14th day of September, 2015
JUDGMENT
In the light of the judgment rendered by this Court on 14.09.2015 in W.P.(C)No. 32166/2015, this Court closes the contempt case as having not survived for further consideration.
Dama Seshadri Naidu, Judge tkv