Annamkutty Ouseph v. Dr.Niveditha P.Haran, Ias

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE WEDNESDAY, THE 22ND DAY OF JULY 2015/31ST ASHADHA, 1937 Con.Case(C).No. 961 of 2015 (S) -------------------------------------------- JUDGMENT DATED 27.8.2014 IN WP(C) 26252/2011 .......

PETITIONER(S)/1ST PETITIONER:

------------------------------------------------ ANNAMKUTTY OUSEPH, AGED 85, W/O.LATE SRI. PAULO OUSEPH, KOORAN KALLOOKKARAN, PEECHANICAD, PULIYANAM P.O., ANGAMALY.

BY ADV. SRI.C.S.AJITH PRAKASH RESPONDENT(S)/1ST RESPONDENT:

----------------------------------------------------- DR.NIVEDITHA P.HARAN, IAS, (AGE AND FATHER'S NAME NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER), PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, REVENUE DEPARTMENT, GOVERNMENT SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM - 695 001.

BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SMT.M.T.SHEEBA THIS CONTEMPT OF COURT CASE (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 22-07-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

msv/

Con.Case(C).No. 961 of 2015 (S) ------------------------------------------- APPENDIX PETITIONER(S)' ANNEXURES:

ANNEXURE A1:

TRUE COPY OF THE JUDGMENT DTD.27.8.2014 IN WP(C) NO.26252/2011.

ANNEXURE A2:

TRUE COPY OF THE PETITION DTD.6.10.2014 SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE RESPONDENT, WITHOUT ITS ANNEXURES.

ANNEXURE A3:

TRUE COPY OF THE NOTICE NO.56136/S1/14/RD DTD.12.12.2014 ISSUED BY THE RESPONDENT.

ANNEXURE A4:

TRUE COPY OF THE ARGUMENT NOTES DTD.6.1.2015 SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE RESPONDENT. ANNEXURE A5:

TRUE COPY OF THE I.A.NO.6651/2015 IN WP(C) NO.26252/2011. ANNEXURE A6:

TRUE COPY OF ORDER DTD.27.5.2015 IN IA.NO.6651/2015. RESPONDENT(S)' ANNEXURES:

NIL //TRUE COPY// P.S. TO JUDGE Msv/

A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE, J.

***************************************************************************** Contempt of Court Case No.961 of 2015 ****************************************************************************** Dated this the 22nd day of July, 2015

JUDGMENT

Both sides submit that the directions in the judgment in W.P.(C) No.26252/2011, have been complied with and the order has been passed. The petitioner is at liberty to challenge the order in accordance with law. Accordingly, this Contempt Case is closed. Sd/- A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE, JUDGE ln