G.Venu v. Dr.P.V.Balachandran
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE MONDAY, THE 3RD DAY OF AUGUST 2015/12TH SRAVANA, 1937 Con.Case(C).No. 975 of 2015 (S) ------------------------------------------- ARISING THE JUDGMENT DATED 19/01/2015 IN WP(C).NO.16039/2014. .........
PETITIONER/PETITIONER:
-------------------------------------- G. VENU, AGED 58 YEARS, S/O. GOPALA PILLAI, SENIOR FARM SUPERVISOR, COLLEGE OF AGRICULTURE, VELLAYANI, RESIDING AT GOKULAM, VENGANOOR P.O, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM.
BY ADVS.SRI.R.S.KALKURA, SRI.M.S.KALESH, SRI.HARISH GOPINATH, SMT.R.BINDU.
RESPONDENTS/RESPONDENTS:
------------------------------------------------
1. DR.P.V. BALACHANDRAN, AGE AND FATHER'S NAME NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER, REGISTRAR, KERALA AGRICULTURAL UNIVERSITY, VELLANIKKARA, THRISSUR -689 219.
2. MARY JOSEPH, AGE AND FATHER'S NAME NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER, THE DEPUTY COMPTROLLER , KERALA AGRICULTURAL UNIVERSITY, VELLANIKKARA, THRISSUR- 689 219.
BY ADV. SRI.BABU JOSEPH KURUVATHAZHA, SC.
THIS CONTEMPT OF COURT CASE (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 03-08-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: rs.
Con.Case(C).No. 975 of 2015 (S) APPENDIX PETITIONER'S ANNEXURES:- ANNEXURE A1 CERTIFIED COPY OF THE JUDGMENT IN WP(C).NO.16039/2014 DATED 19/01/2015.
RESPONDENT'S ANNEXURES:- NIL.
//TRUE COPY// P.S. TO JUDGE rs.
A. MUHAMED MUSTAQUE, J.
-------------------------------------------- Contempt of Court Case No. 975 of 2015 ------------------------------------------- Dated this the 3rd day of August, 2015
J U D G M E N T
It is submitted by the learned standing counsel that the petitioner has been included in the seniority list based on the date of retirement for the purpose of disbursement. 2.
In view of the fact this Court ordered that, nonpayment after 30.06.2015 only would result in payment of interest, no contempt would lie against the respondent. If the default is committed, as noted in the judgment itself that would only result in payment of interest. Thus there is no wilful contempt.
Accordingly, Contempt of Court Case is closed. Sd/- A. MUHAMED MUSTAQUE, JUDGE.
Pn