G.John v. Antony Chacko

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DAMA SESHADRI NAIDU THURSDAY, THE 16TH DAY OF JULY 2015/25TH ASHADHA, 1937 Con.Case(C).No. 980 of 2015 (S) IN WP(C).31537/2014 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ AGAINST THE JUDGMENT IN WP(C) 31537/2014 of HIGH COURT OF KERALA DATED 26-11-2014 PETITIONER/PETITIONER IN THEWPC: - ---------------------------------------------------------- G.JOHN, AGED 50 YEARS, S/O GEORGE, ARAPPURA VADAKKETHIL PUTHEN VEEDU, KUNDARA, KOLLAM DISTRICT-691 506 (EMPANEL CONDUCTOR , KOLLAM UNIT, RETIRED ON 30/11/2012) BY ADV. SRI.N.SASIDHARAN UNNITHAN RESPONDENT/1ST RESPONDENT IN THE WPC: - --------------------------------------------------------------------- ANTONY CHACKO, (AGE AND FATHERE'S NAME NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER), MANAGING DIRECTOR, KERALA STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM -695 023 BY ADV. SRI.M.GOPIKRISHNAN NAMBIAR, SC, KSRTC THIS CONTEMPT OF COURT CASE (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 16-07-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

Con.Case(C).No. 980 of 2015 (S) IN WP(C).31537/2014 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ APPENDIX PETITIONER'S ANNEXURES :

ANNEXURE I :

CERTIFIED COPY OF THE JUDGMENT OF THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT DATED 26.11.2014 IN WP (C) No. 31537/2014. ANNEXURE II :

COPY OF LETTER DATED 23.12.2014 SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER TO THE RESPONDENT.

RESPONDENT'S ANNEXURE :

ANNEXURE R1(a) :

ORDER No. PL.16/014915/12 DATED 02.03.2015.

// TRUE COPY // P.A. TO JUDGE DMR/-

DAMA SESHADRI NAIDU, J.

--------------------------------------------- Contempt Case (c) No. 980 of 2015 ---------------------------------------------- Dated this the 16th day of July, 2015

JUDGMENT

It is reported that the directions in the judgment dated 26.11.2014, in W.P. (C) No. 31537/2014 have been complied with. Recording the said submission, this Court closes the contempt case, leaving it open for the petitioner to lay challenge against Annexure R1(a), if he desires. DAMA SESHADRI NAIDU JUDGE DMR/-