← Library
High Court of KeralaCon.Case(C)/1013/2015closed

V. Mohandas v. Brig. Anil Sharma

2015-11-25Honourable Mr. Justice A.Muhamed Mustaque3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE WEDNESDAY, THE 25TH DAY OF NOVEMBER 2015/4TH AGRAHAYANA, 1937 Con.Case(C).No. 1013 of 2015 (S) -------------------------------------------- JUDGMENT DATED 06-03-2015 IN WP(C) 680/2015.

..........

PETITIONER/PETITIONER IN WPC:

------------------------------------------------- V. MOHANDAS, (EX-NK 1368902 H), AGED 55 YEARS, S/O.K.VISWANBHARAN, "AKHILAM", KOCHUPADINJARA, ATTIPPURA VILLAGE, KULATHOOR P.O., THIRUVANANTHAPURAM - 695 583. BY ADV. SRI.B.HARISH KUMAR RESPONDENT(S)/SECOND & THIRD RESPONDENTS IN WPC: ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

1. BRIG. ANIL SHARMA, (AGE AND FATHER'S NAME NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER) THE DEPUTY DIRECTOR GENERAL, DIRECTOR GENERAL DSC, GENERAL STAFF BRANCH INTEGRATED HQ OF MOD (ARMY)WEST BLOCK III, R K PURAM, NEW DELHI - 110 066.

2. K.C.JAGI, (AGE AND FATHER'S NAME NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER) CHIEF RECORD OFFICER, DSC RECORDS, MILL ROAD, KANNUR, KERALA - 670 013.

BY SRI.N.NAGARESH, A S G THIS CONTEMPT OF COURT CASE (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 25-11-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

mbr/

Con.Case(C).No. 1013 of 2015 (S) ---------------------------------------------- APPENDIX PETITIONERS' ANNEXURES:

ANNEXURE A1 :

CERTIFIED COPY OF THE JUDGMENT IN WP(C)NO.680/2015 DATED 6.3.2015.

ANNEXURE A2 :

A TRUE COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION DATED 19.3.2015 SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT.

RESPONDENTS' ANNEXURES:

ANNEXURE R1(A) : TRUE COPY OF LETTER NO.B/10201/VOL-XIV/MP-3 DATED 28.10.2015 ISSUED BY DIRECTOR MP-3 FOR ADJUTANT GENERAL, INTEGRATED HHQ OF MOF (ARMY) //TRUE COPY// P.S. TO JUDGE mbr/

A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE, J.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ C.O.(C).No.1013/2015 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Dated this the 25th Day of November, 2015

J U D G M E N T

In the light of the compliance reported by the respondents, the contempt of court case is closed.

Sd/- A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE, JUDGE ms