Jitto S.Mangalath v. Sabu B

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.V.RAMAKRISHNA PILLAI THURSDAY, THE 13TH DAY OF AUGUST 2015/22ND SRAVANA, 1937 Con.Case(C).No. 1024 of 2015 (S) ---------------------------------------------- WP(C) 14561/2015, DATED 16-07-2014 ------------------------- PETITIONER(S)/PETITIONER IN W.P.[C]:

------------------------------------------------------- JITTO S.MANGALATH, AGED 36 YEARS, S/O.SUNNY, MANGALATH HOUSE, MONIPPILLY, KOTTAYAM DISTRICT.

BY ADVS.SRI.RENJITH THAMPAN (SR.) SMT.P.R.REENA RESPONDENT(S)/1ST RESPONDENT IN W.P[C]:

-------------------------------------------------------------------- SABU B, AGE AND FATHER'S NAME NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER, THE SECRETARY, UZHAVOOR GRAMA PANCHAYATH, UZHAVOOR.P.O., PIN-686 634.

BY ADVS. SRI.K.C.CHARLES SRI.M.POLY MATHAI SRI.VIMAL K.CHARLES THIS CONTEMPT OF COURT CASE (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 13-08-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

PJ

Con.Case(C).No. 1024 of 2015 (S) ---------------------------------------------- PETITIONERS' ANNEXURES ---------------------------------------- ANNEXURE I: COPY OF THE RELEVANT PAGE OF THE DATA BANK PREPARED BY UZHAVOOR GRAMA PANCHAYATH ANNEXURE II: COPY OF THE LETTER DATED 3/2/14 ISSUED BY THE SECRETARY UZHAVOOR GRAMA PANCHAYATH ANNEXURE III: COPY OF THE JUDGMENT IN WPC.14561/14 DATED 16/7/14 ANNEXURE IV: COPY OF THE LETTER 20/10/14 ISSUED BY THE RESPONDENT TO THE PETITIONER RESPONDENTS' ANNEXURE ---------------------------------------- NIL.

/ TRUE COPY / P.S. TO JUDGE PJ

A.V. RAMAKRISHNA PILLAI, J.

------------------------------------- Cont. Case (C) No.1024 of 2015 in W.P.(C) No.14561 of 2014 -------------------------------------- Dated this the 13th day of August, 2015.

JUDGMENT

The learned counsel for the respondent would submit that the order has been complied with, though it was submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the orders were passed not in accordance with the decisions referred to in the judgment.

As there is substantial compliance, the contempt petition is closed, reserving the right of the petitioner to challenge the orders now passed by the respondent in the appropriate proceedings.

Sd/- A.V. RAMAKRISHNA PILLAI JUDGE Scl.