Jude Joseph v. Sri.Antony Chacko

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V.CHITAMBARESH FRIDAY, THE 31ST DAY OF JULY 2015/9TH SRAVANA, 1937 Con.Case(C).No. 1080 of 2015 (S) IN WP(C).12324/2014 ------------------------------------------------------ JUDGMENT IN WP(C) 12324/2014 of HIGH COURT OF KERALA DATED 07.04.2015 PETITIONER/PETITIONER:

-------------------------------------- JUDE JOSEPH, AGED 50 YEARS, VEHICLE SUPERVISOR, KERALA STATE ROAD TRNASPORT CORPORATION THIRUVANANTHAPURAM CENTRAL, THAMPANOOR, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM.

BY ADV. SRI.VARUN C.VIJAY RESPONDENTS/RESPONDENTS 1 & 3:

-------------------------------------------------------

1. ANTONY CHACKO, FATHER'S NAME AND AGE ARE NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER CHAIRMAN & MANAGING DIRECTOR, KSRTC, TRANSPORT BHAVAN FORTE, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM - 695 001.

2. P.BABUKUMAR, FATHER'S NAME AND AGE ARE NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER DISTRICT TRANSPORT OFFICER KERALA STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION THIRUVANANTHAPURAM CENTRAL, THAMPANOOR THIRUVANANTHAPURAM - 695 001.

BY SRI.M.GOPIKRISHNAN NAMBIAR, SC, KSRTC THIS CONTEMPT OF COURT CASE (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 31-07-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

COC NO. 1080/2015 APPENDIX ANNEXURE I :

TRUE COPY OF THE JUDGMENT DATED 07.04.2015 IN WP(C) NO. 12324/2014 ANNEXURE II :

TRUE COPY OF THE JUDGMENT DATED 22.05.2015 IN W.A. NO. 914/2015 ANNEXURE III :

TRUE COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION DATED 23.05.2015 SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER.

ANNEXURE IV :

TRUE COPY OF THE POSTAL RECEIPT DATED 23.05.2015. /TRUE COPY/ P.A. TO JUDGE.

V. CHITAMBARESH, J -------------------------------- C.O.C. NO. 1080 OF 2015 IN WP(C) NO. 12324 OF 2014 ------------------------------------ Dated this the 31st day of July, 2015

JUDGMENT

It is submitted on behalf of the respondents that the petitioner is free to rejoin duty at the Poovar unit in compliance with Annexures I and II judgments. The petitioner is at liberty to report before the respondents for the purpose of rejoining duty at the earliest.

No case exists for pursuing the contempt of court case proceedings. The Contempt case proceedings are dropped. V. CHITAMBARESH JUDGE ncd