Deepa Sherly S v. Valsamma James

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V.CHITAMBARESH WEDNESDAY, THE 5TH DAY OF AUGUST 2015/14TH SRAVANA, 1937 Con.Case(C).No. 1097 of 2015 (S) IN WP(C).22141/2015 ------------------------------------------------------ JUDGMENT IN WP(C) 22141/2015 of HIGH COURT OF KERALA DATED 23-07-2015 PETITIONER/PETITIONER IN WP(C):

--------------------------------------------------- DEEPA SHERLY S., AGED 42 YEARS, W/O. SIJU VARGHESE, KEVILLIL HOUSE, KARIMKUNNAM P.O., THODUPUZHA - 685 586.

BY ADVS.SRI.SHAJI THOMAS SRI.BINU PAUL RESPONDENT/3RD RESPONDENT IN WP(C):

--------------------------------------------------------------- VALSAMMA JAMES, W/O. JAMES, AGED ABOUTN50 YEARS, CONVENER, DISCIPLINARY SUB COMMITTEE, IDUKKI DISTRICT EX-SERVICEMEN CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETY LIMITED NO. I-1548, THODUPUZHA P.O., PIN - 686 586. R1 BY ADV. SRI.V.G.ARUN R1 BY ADV. SRI.T.R.HARIKUMAR THIS CONTEMPT OF COURT CASE (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 05-08-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

COC NO. 1097/2015 APPENDIX ANNEXURE A1 :

CERTIFIED COPY OF THE ORDER DATED 23.07.2015 IN WP (C) NO. 22141 OF 2015.

ANNEXURE A2 :

TRUE PHOTOCOPY OF THE ORDER DATED 24.07.2015 ISSUED BY THE RESPONDENT.

/TRUE COPY/ P.A. TO JUDGE.

V. CHITAMBARESH, J -------------------------------- C.O.C. NO. 1097 OF 2015 IN WP(C) NO. 22141 OF 2015 ------------------------------------ Dated this the 5th day of August, 2015

JUDGMENT

The respondent concedes that the services of the petitioner have not hitherto been terminated in view of Annexure A1 order of status quo. This is because Annexure A2 order of termination would take effect only from the afternoon of 24.07.2015 much after the respondent was served with Annexure A1 order. No case for initiating contempt of court proceedings exists in view of the stand taken by the respondent. The Contempt Case is dismissed.

V. CHITAMBARESH JUDGE ncd