Sunish George v. James Varghese I A S
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.V.RAMAKRISHNA PILLAI MONDAY, THE 12TH DAY OF OCTOBER 2015/20TH ASWINA, 1937 Con.Case(C).No. 1223 of 2015 (S) ------------------------------------------------ (AGAINST THE JUDGMENT IN WP(C).NO. 3256/2012 DATED 27-05-2015) ------------------ PETITIONER/PETITIONER:
----------------------------------------- SUNISH GEORGE, AGED 42 YEARS, S/O.GEORGE, 37/104 7A, VRINDAVAN COLONY, ERNAKULAM, KOCHI - 682 019.
BY ADV. SRI.E.S.ASHRAF RESPONDENT(S)/RESPONDENTS 1 & 2 IN THE WRIT PETITION: ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1. JAMES VARGHESE I.A.S, (AGE AND FATHER'S NAME NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER) SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT FISHERIES AND PORTS DEPARTMENT, GOVERNMENT SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM.
2. P.SAHADEVAN, AGED 51 YEARS, S/O.P.KRISHNA PODUVAL, MANAGING DIRECTOR KERALA AQUA VENTURES INTERNATIONAL LTD. (KAVIL) EAST KADUNGALLOOR, U.C.COLLEGE P.O., ALUVA, ERNAKULAM - 683 102. R1 BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI.SOJAN JAMES THIS CONTEMPT OF COURT CASE (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 12-10-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
sts
COC.NO.1223/2015 APPENDIX PETITIONER'S ANNEXURES:
ANNEX A1 COPY OF THE MINUTES OF THE 25TH BOARD MEETING. ANNEX A2 COPY OF THE MINUTES OF THE 26TH BOARD MEETING. ANNEX A3 COPY OF THE NOTICE DATED 30/1/2012 ANNEX A4 COPY OF THE JUDGMENT DATED 27/5/2015 IN WP(C).NO.3256/2012 ANNEX A5 COPY OF THE ORDER IN I.A.NO.7540 OF 2015 ANNEX A6 COPY OF THE ORDER DATED 3/8/2015 ANNEX A6(A) COPY OF THE COVERING LETTER OF THE 2ND RESPONDENT ANNEX A7 COPY OF THE RTI APPEAL AS PER RTI ACT DATED 1/8/2013 ANNEX A7(A) COPY OF THE REPLY DATED 4/9/2013 RECEIVED FROM THE JOINT SECRETARY OF FISHERIES DEPARTMENT RESPONDENT'S ANNEXURES:
ANNEX R2(A) COPY OF THE ORDER DATED 03/08/2015 /TRUE COPY/ P.A.TO JUDGE sts
A.V.RAMAKRISHNA PILLAI, J.
= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = C.O(C) No.1223 of 2015 = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = Dated this the 12th day of October, 2015
JUDGMENT
As the direction in the judgment has been complied with though the petitioner is not satisfied with the same, the C.O(C) is closed leaving the adequacy of the amount, if any, to be paid to the petitioner as well as the challenge against Ext.P6 in the writ petition open to be decided in appropriate proceedings. Sd/- A.V.RAMAKRISHNA PILLAI JUDGE krj