Sreeja K. Menon v. Sri.K.D.Haresh
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.V.RAMAKRISHNA PILLAI MONDAY, THE 16TH DAY OF NOVEMBER 2015/25TH KARTHIKA, 1937 Con.Case(C).No. 1359 of 2015 (S) IN WP(C).25098/2015 ------------------------------------------------------ AGAINST THE ORDER/JUDGMENT IN WP(C) NO.25098/2015 OF HIGH COURT OF KERALA DATED 21-08-2015 PETITIONER(S)/PETITIONER:
------------------------------------------ SREEJA K. MENON, AGED 31 YEARS, D/O.PUTHUMANA KESAVAN, MATHILAKOM HOUSE, MARUTHUR P.O.MELE PATTAMBI, PALAKKAD DIST. 679 306. BY ADVS.SRI.K.JAJU BABU (SR.) SMT.M.U.VIJAYALAKSHMI RESPONDENT(S)/2ND RESPONDENT:
---------------------------------------------------------- SRI.K.D.HARESH, AGED 47 YEARS, S/O.K.G.DAMODARAN, SECRETARY, ONGALLUR GRAMA PANCHAYAT, KALLADIPATTA P.O., ONGALLUR 679 313.
BY ADVS. SRI.S.P.ARAVINDAKSHAN PILLAY SMT.N.SANTHA SRI.K.A.BALAN SRI.S.A.ANAND SRI.A.HAROON RASHEED THIS CONTEMPT OF COURT CASE (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 16-11-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
Con.Case(C).No. 1359 of 2015 (S) APPENDIX PETITIONER'S ANNEXURES:
A:- COPY OF THE ORDER DATED 21.5.201`4 ISSUED BY THE HINDUSTAN PETROLEUM CORPORATION LTD. (HPCL) IN FAVOUR OF THE PETITIONER. B:- COPY OF THE DECISION DATED 29.5.2014 OF THE PANCHAYAT COMMITTEE OF THE RESPONDENT.
C:- COPY OF THE LETTER NO.5-2608/15 DATED 26.5.2015 ISSUED BYTHE RESPONDENT. D:- COPY OF THE INTERIM ORDER OF THIS COURT DATED 3.6.2015 IN W.P(C) NO.16481/2015.
E:- COPY OF THE LETTER NO.4490/15 DATED 16.7.2015 ISSUED BY THE RESPONDENT. F:- COPY OF THE JUDGMENT DATED 21.8.2015 IN W.P.C NO.25098/2015 OF THIS COURT. G:- COPY OF THE DECISION OF THE PANCHAYAT TAKEN ON 8.9.2015. RESPONDENT'S ANNEXURES:-NIL KRJ //TRUE COPY// P.A TO JUDGE
A.V.RAMAKRISHNA PILLAI, J.
= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = C.O(C) No.1359 of 2015 in W.P(C) No.25098 of 2015 = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = Dated this the 16th day of November, 2015
JUDGMENT
As orders have been passed in R.P No.925 of 2015 modifying the judgment in the writ petition, the contempt case is closed in the light of the same.
Personal appearance of the respondent is dispensed with. It shall be open to the petitioner to approach this Court if the direction as per the reviewed judgment has not been complied with by the respondents.
Sd/- A.V.RAMAKRISHNA PILLAI JUDGE krj