Roy Mathew v. P.P.Benny

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.VINOD CHANDRAN FRIDAY, THE 16TH DAY OF OCTOBER 2015/24TH ASWINA, 1937 Con.Case(C).No. 1379 of 2015 (S) IN WP(C).21832/2015 ------------------------------------------------------ AGAINST THE JUDGMENT IN WP(C) 21832/2015 of HIGH COURT OF KERALA DATED 21-07-2015 PETITIONER/PETITIONER:

--------------------------------------- ROY MATHEW AGED 50 YEARS2 S/O. MATHEW, GOVERNMENT CONTRACTOR, PAMPLANIYIL HOUSE, BHARANANGANAM P.O., PALA - VIA, KOTTAYAM DISTRICT. BY ADVS.SRI.BABU JOSEPH KURUVATHAZHA SRI.P.T.ABHILASH RESPONDENTS/ 2ND AND 3RD RESPONDENTS:

-------------------------------------------------------------------- 1.

P.P.BENNY, AGE AND NAME OF THE FATHER ARE NOT KNOWN TO THE WORKING AS SUPERINTENDING ENGINEER, PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT (ROADS & BRIDGES), CENTRAL CIRCLE, ALUVA, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT PIN 683 101.

2.

T.K. BAL DEV, AGE AND NAME OF THE FATHER ARE NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER, WORKING AS EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT (ROADS & BRIDGES DIVISION), CHEMBUKAVU, THRISSUR - 680 020.

BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SMT. A. LOWSY THIS CONTEMPT OF COURT CASE (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 16-10-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

Con.Case(C).No. 1379 of 2015 (S) IN WP(C).21832/2015 APPENDIX PETITIONER'S ANNEXURES ANNEXURE - A :

TRUE COPY OF THE JUDGMENT DATED 21.7.2015 IN W.P.(C) NO.21832/2015 OF THIS HON'BLE COURT ANNEXURE - B :

TRUE COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION DATED 1.7.2015 MARKED AS EXT.P9 IN THE WRIT PETITION.

RESPONDENT'S ANNEXURES NIL //TRUE COPY// P.A. TO JUDGE JJJ

K. VINOD CHANDRAN, J.

------------------------------------------ Contempt of Court Case No. 1379 of 2015 (S) ------------------------------------------ Dated this the 16th day of October, 2015

J U D G M E N T

The learned Government Pleader, on behalf of the 2nd respondent, submits that the measurements of the work, that is completed till now, have been completed as directed in the judgment and the bills have been submitted for sanction.

In such circumstance, the Contempt Case would stand closed.

Sd/- K.VINOD CHANDRAN, JUDGE //True Copy// P.A. to Judge jjj 16/10/15