High Court of KeralaCon.Case(C)/1393/2015closed

Hussain Manikfan v. H. Rajesh Prasad

2015-10-26Honourable Mr.Justice V.Chitambaresh3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V.CHITAMBARESH MONDAY, THE 26TH DAY OF OCTOBER 2015/4TH KARTHIKA, 1937 Con.Case(C).No. 1393 of 2015 (S) IN W.P.(C.) NO.34726/2014 --------------------------------------------------------------------------------- JUDGMENT IN W.P.(C.) NO. 34726/2014 of HIGH COURT OF KERALA DATED 06-01-2015 ..................................

PETITIONER/PETITIONER:

---------------------------------------- HUSSAIN MANIKFAN AGED 67 YEARS S/O. LATE DON MANIKFAN, FURAKKAD AOUGE SEDIVALU VILLAGE, MINIKOY, PI N-682559 U.T.OF LAKSHADWEEP.

BY ADV. SRI.E.S.ASHRAF RESPONDENT/RESPONDENTS 1 & 4 IN THE WRIT PETITION: ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

1. H. RAJESH PRASAD, I.A.S (AGE AND FATHER'S NAME NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER) THE ADMINSTRATOR, U.T. OF LAKSHADWEEP, KAVARATTI PIN-682555.

2. T.C.POOKOYA (AGE AND FATHER'S NAME NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER) THE LAND ACQUISITION COLLECTOR ADMINISTRATION OF THE UNION TERRITORY, LAKSHADWEEP COLLECTORATE, KAVARATHI, PIN-682555.

R1 & R2 BY ADV. SRI.S.RADHAKRISHNAN, SC, LAKSHADWEEP ADMINISTRATION THIS CONTEMPT OF COURT CASE (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 26-10-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

Con.Case(C).No. 1393 of 2015 (S) APPENDIX PETITIONER(S)' ANNEXURES -------------------------------------------- ANNEXURE A1 CERTIFIED COPY OF THE JUDGMENT DATED 06.01.2015 IN WP.(C). NO. 34726 OF 2014 ANNEXURE A2 COPY OF THE ORDER DATED 20.05.2015 PASSED BY THE 1ST RESPONDENT RESPONDENT(S)' ANNEXURES:- NIL --------------------------------------- /TRUE COPY/ P.A. TO JUDGE DCS

V. CHITAMBARESH, J --------------------------------------- Cont. of Court Case (C). No. 1393 OF 2015 ---------------------------------------- Dated this the 26th day of October, 2015

JUDGMENT

There is evidently a dispute as regards apportionment of compensation warranting a reference to the Court of District Judge. The directions in Annexure A1 judgment have been complied with and the remedy if any of the petitioner is to challenge the reference made. The Contempt of Court case is closed.

V. CHITAMBARESH JUDGE DCS