Sakariya P.C. v. Himanshu Kumar Roy

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.VINOD CHANDRAN MONDAY, THE 23RD DAY OF NOVEMBER 2015/2ND AGRAHAYANA, 1937 Con.Case(C).No. 1448 of 2015 (S) IN WP(C).23181/2015 ------------------------------------------------------ AGAINST THE JUDGMENT IN WP(C) 23181/2015 of HIGH COURT OF KERALA DATED 31.7.2015 PETITIONER(S)/PETITIONER:

------------------------------------------------ SAKARIYA P.C. AGED 38 YEARS S/O.MOITHEENKUTTY, PAIKATTUCHALI POOVATHIKKAL P.O, URNGATTIRI VILLAGE, URNGATTIRI TALUK MALAPPURAM DISTRICT. (OWNER OF LORRY BEARING REGISTRATION NO.KL-11-E-7189).

BY ADV. SRI.P.M.ZIRAJ RESPONDENT(S)/2ND RESPONDENT:

---------------------------------------------------------- HIMANSHU KUMAR ROY, AGED 48 YEARS FATHERS NAME NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER KOZHIKODE, KOZHIKODE DISTRICT. PIN - 673 661. R BY STATE ATTORNEY SRI. P.VIJAYARAGHAVAN THIS CONTEMPT OF COURT CASE (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 23-11-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

Con.Case(C).No. 1448 of 2015 (S) IN WP(C).23181/2015 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- APPENDIX PETITIONERS EXHIBITS:

ANNEXURE A1 COPY OF THE JUDGMENT OF THIS HON'BLE COURT DTD. 31.7.15 IN WPC 23181 OF 2015 ANNEXURE A2 COPY OF THE ACKNOWLEDGEMENT OF THE RECEIPT OF THE COPY OF JUDGMENT BY THE OFFICE OF THE RESPONDENT.

RESPONDENTS EXHIBITS:

NIL // TRUE COPY // P.A TO JUDGE SB

K. VINOD CHANDRAN, J.

===================== Contempt of Court case No.1448 of 2015 - S ================================= Dated this the 23rd day of November, 2015

J U D G M E N T

The petitioner is aggrieved with the fact that the sampling as per Annexure A1 judgment dated 31.07.2015 had not been complied with. However, the learned Government Pleader on instructions submits that on 11.11.2015, the sampling had been done. The delay occurred allegedly due to the non-production of the judgment. It is directed that the matter shall be expedited.

In any event, now that directions have been complied with, the contempt of court case would stand closed. Sd/- K. VINOD CHANDRAN, JUDGE SB/23/11/2015 // true copy // P.A to Judge.