Viswanatha Pillai v. P.G.Thomas
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE T.R.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR TUESDAY, THE 11TH DAY OF AUGUST 2015/20TH SRAVANA, 1937 Con.Case(C).No. 552 of 2013 (S) IN WP(C).17628/2012 ----------------------------------------------------- IN WP(C) 17628/2012 of HIGH COURT OF KERALA ------------------------------------ PETITIONER(S):
-------------------------- VISWANATHA PILLAI.K, LEKSHMI BHAVAN, THAZHAM MURI, PAVITHRESWARAM KARIMPINPUZHA P.O., KOTTARAKKARA - 691513.
BY ADV. SRI.G.BHAGAVAT SINGH RESPONDENT(S):
---------------------------- P.G.THOMAS S/O.NAME NOT KNOWN, AGED AROUND 57 YEARS DISTRICT COLLECTOR, CIVIL STATION, KOLLAM - 691 013. R1 BY ADV. GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI.MOHAMMED SAVAD THIS CONTEMPT OF COURT CASE (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 11-08-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
Con.Case(C).No. 552 of 2013 (S) IN WP(C).17628/2012 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ APPENDIX PETITIONER(S)' ANNEXURE :
------------------------------------------- ANNEXURE AI :
PHOTOCOPY OF THE REPLY DATED 13.03.2013 ISSUED BY THE PUBLIC INFORMATION OFFICER ATTACHED TO THE OFFICE OF THE CESS.
ANNEXURE A2 :
CERTIFIED COPY OF THE JUDGMENT IN W.P.C.NO.17628/2012 DATED 13.09.2012 RESPONDENT(S)' ANNEXURE :
---------------------------------------------- ANNEXURE R1(A) :
TRUE COPY OF COMMUNICATION FROM AGES DATED 20.09.2013.
/TRUE COPY/ PA TO JUDGE VS
T.R.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR, J.
--------------------------------------------------- Con.Case.No.552 of 2013 --------------------------------------------------- Dated this the 11th day of August, 2015
JUDGMENT
The allegations in this case is that the direction in Annexure A2 judgment of have not been complied with. The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that there is a subsequent development whereby the Government had issued a ban as far as the mining of sand from Kallada river for three years.
The same is confirmed by the learned Government Pleader also. Recording the same, the contempt case is closed.
Sd/- T.R.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR, JUDGE vs