High Court of KeralaCon.Case(C)/1540/2015closed

Thulaseedharan K. v. Sreekumar

2015-11-18Honourable Mr.Justice V.Chitambaresh3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V.CHITAMBARESH WEDNESDAY, THE 18TH DAY OF NOVEMBER 2015/27TH KARTHIKA, 1937 Con.Case(C).No. 1540 of 2015 (S) IN W.P.(C).NO.15457/2015 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- ARISING OUT OF JUDGMENT IN W.P.(C.) NO.15457/2015 DATED 26-05-2015 ................................................... PETITIONER/PETITIONER --------------------------------------- THULASEEDHARAN K., AGED 48 YEARS S/O.K.KUTTY, NORTH POLICE QUARTERS, G.B.NO.21 ALAPPUZHA -688012, DRIVER-DISTRICT TRANSPORT OFFICER TRIVANDRUM CITY UNIT.

BY ADVS.SRI.HARISH GOPINATH SRI.SANIL KUNJACHAN SMT.T.M.RESHMI SANIL RESPONDENTS/RESPONDENTS:- ------------------------------------------------

1. SREEKUMAR, AGED 52 YEARS FATHER'S NAME NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER GENERAL PERSONAL MANAGER KERALA STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695001.

2. PRASANNA KUMAR, AGE AND FATHER'S NAME NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER DISTRICT TRANSPORT OFFICER(D.T.O) KERALA STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695001.

BY SRI.M.GOPIKRISHNAN NAMBIAR, SC, KSRTC THIS CONTEMPT OF COURT CASE (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 18-11-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

Con.Case(C).No. 1540 of 2015 (S) APPENDIX PETITIONER(S) ANNEXURES:- ANNEXURE A1 : CERTIFIED COPY OF THE JUDGMENT IN W.P.(C). NO. 15457/2015 DATED 26.05.2015 ANNEXURE A2 : TRUE COPY OF THE NOTICE NO. P1/1216/15/2014 DATED 17.7.2015 ISSUED FROM THE THIRD RESPONDENT (DISTRICT TRANSPORT OFFICER) ANNEXURE A3 : TRUE COPY OF REPRESENTATION BEFORE THE 3RD RESPONDENT DATED 21.07.2015 RESPONDENT(S) EXHIBITS :- NIL /TRUE COPY/ P.A. TO JUDGE.

DCS

V. CHITAMBARESH, J --------------------------------------- Cont. of Court Case (C). No. 1540 OF 2015 ---------------------------------------- Dated this the 18th day of November, 2015

JUDGMENT

The directions in the judgment have since been complied with. It is open to the petitioner to challenge the consequential order passed.

The contempt of court case is closed.

V. CHITAMBARESH JUDGE DCS