Rachel K.Varghese v. T.Dileep Kumar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.V.RAMAKRISHNA PILLAI WEDNESDAY, THE 11TH DAY OF NOVEMBER 2015/20TH KARTHIKA, 1937 Con.Case(C).No. 1584 of 2015 (S) --------------------------------------------------- AGAINST THE ORDER IN W.P.(C).NO.24579/2015 (V), DATED 12-08-2015 ------------------ PETITIONER(S)/PETITIONER IN THE WRIT PETITION : ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- RACHEL K.VARGHESE, W/O.K.VARKEY VARGHESE, KEECHERIL HOUSE, PARIYARAM.P.O., MALLAPPALLY, PATHANAMTHITTA-689 585.

BY ADV. SRI.S.SUBHASH CHAND RESPONDENT(S)/RESPONDENT NOS.3 & 4 IN THE WRIT PETITION : ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

1. T.DILEEP KUMAR, AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS, (FATHER'S NAME NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER), THE SECRETARY (SPECIAL GRADE), MALLAPPALLY GRAMA PANCHAYAT, MALLAPPALLY WEST.P.O., PATHANAMTHITTA.

2. P.G.PURUSHOTHAMAN PILLAI, AGED 45 YEARS, (FATHER'S NAME NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER), SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, KEEZHVAIPUR POLICE STATION, KEEZHVAIPUR, PATHANAMTHITTA.

R1 BY ADV. SRI.SOORANAD S.SREEKUMAR R2 BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI.SOJAN JAMES THIS CONTEMPT OF COURT CASE (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 11-11-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

Msd.

Con.Case(C).No. 1584 of 2015 (S) --------------------------------------------------- APPENDIX PETITIONER(S)' ANNEXURES :

ANNEXURE 1:

TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER DATED 12.08.2015 IN W.P.(C).NO.2579 OF 2015.

ANNEXURE 2:

PHOTOGRAPH SHOWING THE UNAUTHORIZED PARKING.

ANNEXURE 3:

PHOTOGRAPH SHOWING THE UNAUTHORIZED PARKING.

RESPONDENT(S)' ANNEXURES :

NIL //TRUE COPY// P.A.TO JUDGE.

Msd.

A.V. RAMAKRISHNA PILLAI, J.

-------------------------------------------------- Cont. Case (C) No. 1584 of 2015 in W.P.(C) No. 24579 of 2015 -------------------------------------------------- Dated this the 11th day of November, 2015

J U D G M E N T

The learned counsel for the respondent panchayath submits that the order has been complied with by placing 'No Parking' board. However, the learned counsel for the petitioner submits that in spite of the same, vehicles are being parked.

The petitioner shall approach the 2nd respondent to implement the order in letter and spirit. It is the duty of the 2nd respondent to see that the order is complied with without fail.

The contempt case is closed reserving the right of the petitioner to approach this Court if the cause of action survives thereafter.

Sd/- A.V. RAMAKRISHNA PILLAI JUDGE bka/11.11.2015