← Library
High Court of KeralaCon.Case(C)/1644/2015closed

P.K.Chekkutty v. Sri.P.Bhaskaran

2015-12-15Honourable Mr. Justice A.Muhamed Mustaque3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE TUESDAY, THE 15TH DAY OF DECEMBER 2015/24TH AGRAHAYANA, 1937 Con.Case(C).No. 1644 of 2015 (S) ----------------------------------------------- JUDGMENT DATED 12.11.2014 IN WP(C) 29930/2014. ..........

PETITIONER/PETITIONER :

-------------------------------------- P.K.CHEKKUTTY, AGED 57 YEARS, S/O. PAREEKUTTY, PAYYANADTHODI HOUSE, VALILLAPUZHA P.O., MALAPPURAM DISTRICT-673 639.

BY ADVS.SRI.K.M.SATHYANATHA MENON SMT.KAVERY S THAMPI RESPONDENT(S)/RESPONDENTS 2 AND 3:

--------------------------------------------------------------

1. SRI.P.BHASKARAN, AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS, FATHER'S NAME NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER, DISTRICT COLLECTOR, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT, PIN - 676 505.

2. DR. J.O.ARUN, AGED ABOUT 32 YEARS, FATHER'S NAME NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER, DEPUTY COLLECTOR, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT, PIN - 676 505.

BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI.BIJU MEENATTOOR THIS CONTEMPT OF COURT CASE (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 15-12-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

mbr/

Con.Case(C).No. 1644 of 2015 (S) ----------------------------------------------- APPENDIX PETITIONERS' ANNEXURES:

ANNEXURE A:

CERTIFIED COPY OF THE JUDGMENT DATED 12.11.2014 IN WP(C)NO.29930 OF 2014 OF THE LEARNED SINGLE JUDGE. ANNEXURE B:

TRUE COPY OF THE COMMUNICATION DATED 21.8.2015 ISSUED BY THE 1ST RESPONDENT ADDRESSED TO THE DIVISIONAL FOREST OFFICER, NILAMBUR AND THE TAHSILDAR, ERNAD.

RESPONDENTS' ANNEXURES:

NIL.

//TRUE COPY// P.S. TO JUDGE mbr/

A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE, J.

================== Cont.Case No.1644 of 2015 ================== Dated this the 15th day of December, 2015

J U D G M E N T

Considering the nature of directions given in the judgment, this Court is of the view that there is no contempt. Therefore the petitioner is at liberty to challenge any action on the part of the respondents in not demarcating the land referred in the judgment by separate writ petition. With that liberty the Contempt Case is closed.

sab A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE, JUDGE