P.Subramanian v. Dr.T.A.Abdul Majeed

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.VINOD CHANDRAN TUESDAY, THE 22ND DAY OF DECEMBER 2015/1ST POUSHA, 1937 Con.Case(C).No. 1698 of 2015 (S) IN WP(C).8469/2012 ----------------------------------------------------- AGAINST THE JUDGMENT IN WP(C) 8469/2012 of HIGH COURT OF KERALA DATED 24-11-2014 PETITIONER(S)/PETITIONERS:

-------------------------------------------------- P.SUBRAMANIAN AGED 62 YEARS S/O.LATE P.CHOYI, 'SNEHAM', FEROKE P.O.

CALICUT-673631.

BY ADV. SRI.KALEESWARAM RAJ RESPONDENT(S)/RESPONDENTS:

----------------------------------------------------

1. DR.T.A.ABDUL MAJEED FATHER'S NAME AND AGE ARE NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER THE REGISTRAR, UNIVERSITY OF CALICUT CALICUT UNIVERSITY P.O., MALAPPURAM, PIN 673635.

2. DR.V.V.GEORGEKUTTY FATHER'S NAME AND AGE ARE NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER THE CONTROLLER OF EXAMINATIONS UNIVERSITY OF CALICUT, CALICUT UNIVERSITY P.O. MALAPPURAM, PIN 673635.

3. DR.M.K.ABDUL KHADER FATHER'S NAME AND AGE ARE NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER CHAIRMAN OF ACADAMIC COUNCIL & VICE CHANCELLOR UNIVERSITY OF CALICUT, CALICUT UNIVERSITY P.O. MALAPPURAM, PIN 673635.

R BY SRI.SANTHOSH MATHEW,SC,CALICUTY UNIVERS THIS CONTEMPT OF COURT CASE (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 22-12-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

Con.Case(C).No. 1698 of 2015 (S) IN WP(C).8469/2012 APPENDIX PETITIONERS EXHIBITS:

ANNEXURE I COPY OF THE JUDGMENT DTD. 24.11.14 IN W.P.C NO.8469 OF 2012 ANNEXURE II COPY OF THE LAWYER NOTICE DTD. 2.12.14 ANNEXURE III COPY OF THE NOTE NO.1166/EPR-IV-ASST-1/2014/P ANNEXURE IV COPY OF THE NOTE TO ACADEMIC COUNCIL NO.EPR IV/2/LLB(OS) 2012 DTD.24.2.14 ANNEXURE V COPY OF THE LAWYER NOTICE DTD.15.8.15 TOGETHER WITH ACKNOWLEDGE CARDS.

RESPONDENTS EXHIBITS:

NIL // TRUE COPY // P.A TO JUDGE.

SB

K. VINOD CHANDRAN, J.

========================= Contempt of Court Case No.1698 of 2015 - S ============================================= Dated this the 22nd day of December, 2015

J U D G M E N T

The learned Counsel for the petitioner submits that Annexure 1 judgment dated 24.11.2014 has already been complied with.

The contempt of court case hence would stand closed.

Sd/- K. VINOD CHANDRAN, JUDGE SB/22/12/2015 // true copy // P.A to Judge.