Ajmal Mohammed v. Mr.Rakesh Sharma

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE WEDNESDAY, THE 23RD DAY OF DECEMBER 2015/2ND POUSHA, 1937 Con.Case(C).No. 1744 of 2015 (S) -------------------------------------------- JUDGMENT IN WP(C).NO.26953/2015 DATED 23-09-2015 ........

CONTEMPT PETITIONER:

-------------------------------------- AJMAL MOHAMMED, AGED 18 YEARS, S/O. SHARMILA. P.R, AL AJ MANZIL, K.D.P. PO., SOUTH KALAMASSERY, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT.

BY ADVS.SRI.S.GANESH, SRI.P.S.SIDHAN.

RESPONDENTS:

-------------------------

1. MR. RAKESH SHARMA, MANAGING DIRECTOR, CANARA BANK LTD, HEAD OFFICE, 112, JC ROAD, BANGALORE-560 002.

2. MR. AJI MATHEW VARGHESE, BRANCH MANAGER, CANARA BANK LTD, KALAMASSERY BRANCH, KOTTOAPURATH ARCADE, CHURCH ROAD, NORTH KALAMASSERY-683 104.

BY ADVS. SRI.M.GOPIKRISHNAN NAMBIAR, SC, SRI.P.GOPINATH MENON, SRI.P.BENNY THOMAS, SRI.K.JOHN MATHAI, SRI.JOSON MANAVALAN, SRI.KURYAN THOMAS.

THIS CONTEMPT OF COURT CASE (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 23-12-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: rs.

Con.Case(C).No. 1744 of 2015 (S) APPENDIX PETITIONER'S ANNEXURES:- ANNEXURE A1 COPY OF THE JUDGMENT IN WP(C).NO.26953/2015 DATED 23/09/2015.

ANNEXURE A2 COPY OF THE LETTER FORWARDING THE JUDGMENT DATED 03/10/2015.

ANNEXURE A3 COPY OF THE JUDGMENT DATED 27/10/2015 IN W.A. NO.2325/2015.

ANNEXURE A4 COPY OF THE LAWYER'S NOTICE DATED 02/11/2015 ISSUED TO RESPONDENTS.

RESPONDENT'S ANNEXURES:- ANNEXURE R2A COPY OF THE E-MAIL DATED 23/11/2015 FROM THE 2ND RESPONDENT TO THE PETITIONER.

ANNEXURE R2B COPY OF THE LETTER DATED 25/11/2015 FROM THE 2ND RESPONDENT TO THE PETITIONER.

ANNEXURE R2C COPY OF THE LETTER DATED 24/11/2015 FROM THE MOTHER OF THE PETITIONER TO THE 2ND RESPONDENT, RECEIVED ON 26/11/2015 BY POST.

//TRUE COPY// P.S. TO JUDGE rs.

A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE, J.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ C.O.(C).No.1744/2015 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Dated this the 23rd Day of December, 2015

J U D G M E N T

Both sides submit that the directions in the judgment have been complied with. Accordingly, the contempt of court case is closed. Sd/- A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE, JUDGE ms