R.Selvan v. Usha Radhakrishnan
This judgment came from a scanned document and its text layer is unreliable — words may be garbled. Check the original PDF before relying on any passage.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P.N.RAVINDRAN THURSDAY, THE 19TH DAY OF DECEMBER 2013/28TH AGRAHAYANA, 1935 Con.Case(C).No. 906 of 2013 (S) IN WP(C).3498/2012 ---------------------------------------------------- (AGAINST THE JUDGMENT IN WP(C) 3498/2012 of HIGH COURT OF KERALA DATED 08-03-2013) PETITIONER/PETITIONER:
-------------------------------------- R.SELVAN OPERATOR, KERALA WATER AUTHORITY PALAKKAD WATER SUPPLY SCHEME SECTION, MALAMPUZHA PALAKKAD BY ADVS.SRI.R.RAJASEKHARAN PILLAI SMT.SABINA JAYAN RESPONDENT/3RD RSPONDENT:
---------------------------------------------- USHA RADHAKRISHNAN AGE AND FATHERS NAME NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER ASST.EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, PH SUB SECTION, KERALA WATER AUTHORITY, PALAKKAD 678 001 BY ADV. SRI.GEORGE MATHEW, SC, KERALA WATER AUTHORITY THIS CONTEMPT OF COURT CASE (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 19-12-2013, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
CO(C).No. 906 of 2013 --------------------------- APPENDIX PETITIONER(S)' ANNEXURES ------------------------------------- ANNEXURE-1 :
COPY OF JUDGMENT DTD 8.3.2013 IN WP(C) NO.3498/2012 OF THIS HON'BLE COURT RESPONDENT(S)' ANNEXURES --------------------------------------- NIL /TRUE COPY/ VPS PA TO JUDGE
P.N.RAVINDRAN, J.
--------------------------- Contempt Case (C) No.906 of 2013 -------------------------- Dated this the 19th day of December, 2013
J U D G M E N T
This contempt case is filed alleging that the respondent herein has wilfully disobeyed the direction issued by this Court in Annexure-I judgment dated 8.3.2013 in W.P.(C) No.3498 of 2012. When this contempt case came up for hearing today, Sri.George Mathew, learned counsel appearing for the Kerala Water Authority submitted that orders have been issued on 22.11.2013 re-fixing the petitioner's pay pursuant to the direction issued by this Court in Annexure-I judgment dated 8.3.2013 in W.P.(C) No.3498 of 2012. A copy of the said order was made available to me for perusal. The learned counsel also submitted that monetary benefits consequent on such re-fixation will be disbursed to the petitioner at the earliest and in any event within two months from today. The aforesaid submission is recorded and the contempt case is closed.
P.N.RAVINDRAN, (JUDGE) vps