Subaida v. K.T.Ratna Bai

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.SURENDRA MOHAN THURSDAY, THE 5TH DAY OF FEBRUARY 2015/16TH MAGHA, 1936 Con.Case(C).No. 395 of 2014 (S) IN WP(C).8061/2013 ---------------------------------------------------- AGAINST THE JUDGMENT IN WP(C) 8061/2013 DATED 09-04-2013 PETITIONER(S)/PETITIONER IN W.P(C)8061 OF 2013: ------------------------------------------------ SUBAIDA D/O.YUNESKUTTY, KARIMBINTHARA VEEDU, BYE-PASS ROAD CHOTTANIKKARA PANCHAYATH.

BY ADVS.SRI.R.LAKSHMI NARAYAN SMT.R.RANJINI RESPONDENT(S)/IST RESPONDENT IN W.P(C)8061 OF 2013: ------------------------------------------------ K.T.RATNA BAI AGE AND D/O.NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER, SECRETARY CHOTTANIKKARA GRAMA PANCHAYATH OFFICE OF THE CHOTTANIKKARA GRAMA PANCHAYATH CHOTTANIKKARA-682312.

ADDL.R2 SINI K.Y TALUK SURVEYOR, KANAYANNUR TALUK ERNAKULAM (IMPLEADED AS ADDL.R2 VIDE ORDER DT.2.6.2014 IN I.A.185/2014 R1 BY ADV. SRI.S.SREEKUMAR (SR.) R1 BY ADV. SRI.P.PRIJITH R2 BY ADV. GOVERNMENT PLEADER R BY SRI.P.MARTIN JOSE THIS CONTEMPT OF COURT CASE (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 05-02-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

K. SURENDRA MOHAN,J.

------------------------------- Cont. Case NO.395 OF 2014 ---------------------------------- Dated this the 5th February, 2015.

JUDGMENT

I have already disposed of WPC 17314/2014 issuing directions in the matter of implementing the report of the Taluk Surveyor, in accordance with Annexure B sketch produced in this case. In view of the above, no further action is necessary to be pursued in this contempt case. The same is therefore closed.

Sd/- K. SURENDRA MOHAN Judge jj /True copy/