Karthyayani v. P. Bhaskaran
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C.T.RAVIKUMAR MONDAY, THE 9TH DAY OF FEBRUARY 2015/20TH MAGHA, 1936 Con.Case(C).No. 423 of 2014 (S) IN WP(C).25676/2013 ----------------------------------------------------- AGAINST THE JUDGMENT IN WP(C) 25676/2013 of HIGH COURT OF KERALA DATED 07-11-2013 PETITIONER(S)/PETITIONER IN W.P.(C):
-------------------------------------------- KARTHYAYANI, AGED 88 YEARS W/O.KONNAKUTTY, KORASERY HOUSE, CHITTATTUKARA VADAKKEKARA P.O., PARAVUR TALUK, PIN-683 522 ERNAKULAM DISTRICT.
BY ADVS.SRI.V.A.PRADEEP KUMAR SMT.JENNY THANKAM RESPONDENT(S)/R5:
--------------------- P. BHASKARAN (AGE AND FATHER'S NAME NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER) NOW WORKING AS THE ASSISTANT EXECUTIVE ENGINEER KERALA WATER AUTHORITY, W.S.SUB DIVISION NORTH PARAVUR, PIN-683513, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT. BY SRI.GEORGE MATHEW, SC, KERALA WATER AUTHORITY THIS CONTEMPT OF COURT CASE (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 09-02-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
Con.Case(C).No. 423 of 2014 (S) IN WP(C).25676/2013 APPENDIX PETITIONER'S ANNEXURES:
ANNEXURE A:
CERTIFIED COPY OF JUDGMENT DATED 7.11.2013 IN W.P. (C) 25676 OF 2013 OF THIS HONOURABLE COURT.
ANNEXURE B:
TRUE COPY OF LETTER DATED 31.12.2013 BY THE MANAGING DIERECTOR, KERALA WATER AUTHORITY.
RESPONDENT'S ANNEXURES:
NIL //TRUE COPY// P.A. TO JUDGE dlk
C.T.RAVIKUMAR, J --------------------------------------- C.O (C) No.423 of 2014 ---------------------------------------- Dated this the 9th day of February, 2015
JUDGMENT
The captioned contempt petition has been filed alleging wilful disobedience with the directions of this Court in the judgment dated 7.11.2013 in W.P.(C) No.25676/2013. As per the said judgment the 5th respondent was directed to take appropriate steps on Ext.P6 application submitted by the petitioner for family pension. When this matter is taken up for consideration the learned Government Pleader furnished a copy of order bearing No. G.O.(Rt) No.78/2015/WRD dated 28.1.2015. A perusal of the same would reveal that sanction was already accorded for granting family pension to the petitioner. In the said circumstances, recording the same this contempt case is closed.
Sd/- C.T.RAVIKUMAR,JUDGE.
dlk