A Vamanan v. Sri.P J P Hanaman
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.V.RAMAKRISHNA PILLAI FRIDAY, THE 13TH DAY OF MARCH 2015/22ND PHALGUNA, 1936 Con.Case(C).No. 781 of 2014 (S) IN WP(C).12606/2008 ----------------------------------------------------- AGAINST THE ORDER/JUDGMENT IN WP(C) 12606/2008 of HIGH COURT OF KERALA DATED 19-11-2013 PETITIONER IN THE WPC:
---------------------------------------- A VAMANAN, AGED 51 YEARS S/O R. APPUKUTTAN, ENCHAKKARA HOUSE, BALARAMAPURAM THIRUVANANTHAPURAM DISTRICT BY ADV. SRI.GOPAKUMAR R.THALIYAL RESPONDENT(S)/3RD RESPONDENT:
---------------------------------------------------------- SRI.P J P HANAMAN, AGE AND FATHER'S NAME NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER, INSPECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE, NES, CRPF BISHOP COTTON ROAD, SHILLONG, MEGHALAYA 793001 * NAME AND ADDRESS OF RESPONDENT IS CORRECTED. * SRI P.J. MOHANAN, INSPECTOR GENERAL, BIHAR SECTOR, CENTRAL RESERVE POLICE FORCE, PATNA , BIHAR NAME AND ADDRESS OF THE RESPONDENT IS CORRECTED VIDE ORDER DATED 7-11-2014 IN I.A. NO.431/2014 R, BY ADV. SRI.N.NAGARESH, ASSISTANT SOLICITOR GENERAL THIS CONTEMPT OF COURT CASE (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 13-03-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
Con.Case(C).No. 781 of 2014 (S) IN WP(C).12606/2008 APPENDIX PETITIONERS ANNEXURES ANNEXURE 1 COPY OF THE JUDGMENT PASSED BY THIS HONOURABLE COURT IN W.P.C. NO.12606/2008 -A DATED 19-11-2013 ANNEXURE 11 COPY OF THE ORDER PASSED BY THIS HONOURABLE COURT IN I.A. NO.1202/2014 IN W.PC. NO.12606 OF 2008 DATED 24-01-2014 ANNEXURE III COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER DATED 3-2-2014 ANNEXURE IV COPY OF THE ORDER PASSED BY THE RESPONDENT DATED 15-10-2014 ANNEXURE V COPY OF THE ORDER PASSED BY THE RESPONDENT DATED 9-2-2015 RESPONDENTS ANNEXURES NIL TRUE COPY P.A TO JUDGE SMM
A.V.RAMAKRISHNA PILLAI,J ................................................. . C.O(C) No.781 of 2014 .............................................. Dated this the 13th day of March, 2015.
J U D G M E N T
It is submitted that the directions in the judgment have been complied with. Accordingly Contempt of Court Case is closed.
A.V.RAMAKRISHNA PILLAI, JUDGE smm