G.Valsalamma v. K.Sobhana

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE T.R.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR TUESDAY, THE 11TH DAY OF AUGUST 2015/20TH SRAVANA, 1937 Con.Case(C).No. 1509 of 2012 (S) IN WP(C).30364/2008 ------------------------------------------------------ IN WP(C) 30364/2008 of HIGH COURT OF KERALA DATED 25-01-2012 ------------------------------------------- PETITIONER(S):

-------------------------- G.VALSALAMMA, AGED 49 YEARS W/O. SRI. HARIKUMAR.B.

RESIDING AT THALINOT SREEHARI, PLAPPALLY.P.O. KOTTARAKKARA, KOLLAM WORKING AS PART TIME SEWING TEACHER KRISHNA VILASOM LOWER PRIMARY SCHOOL, CHITHARA KADAKKAL, KOLLAM DISTRICT.

BY ADV. SRI.M.V.BOSE RESPONDENT(S):

---------------------------- K.SOBHANA (AGE OF THE RESPONDENT AND FATHER'S NAME IS NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER) PRESENTLY WORKING AS THE DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF EDUCATION KOLLAM.

R1 BY ADV. GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI.RAMPRASAD UNNI.T. THIS CONTEMPT OF COURT CASE (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 11-08-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

Con.Case(C).No. 1509 of 2012 (S) IN WP(C).30364/2008 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- APPENDIX PETITIONER(S) ANNEXURE :

------------------------------------------ ANNEXURE I :

CERTIFIED COPY OF THE JUDGMENT DATED 15TH DAY OF JANUARY, 2012 IN WP.C.NO.30364 OF 2008.

ANNEXURE II :

TRUE COPY OF THE LETTER DATED 20.02.2012 ANNEXURE III :

TRUE COPY OF THE G.O.(MS)NO.257/2009 DATED 31.12.2009 RESPONDENT(S)' ANNEXURE :

--------------------------------------------- ANNEXURE R1(A) :

A TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER NO.OAI(5)20335/2008 DATED 3.12.2013.

/TRUE COPY/ PA TO JUDGE VS

T.R.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR, J.

--------------------------------------------------- Con.Case.No.1509 of 2012 --------------------------------------------------- Dated this the 11th day of August, 2015

JUDGMENT

The writ petitioner in W.P.(C).No.30364/2008 is the petitioner herein.

2. The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that in view of the subsequent order passed by the Government dated 07.08.2013, which has been produced by the learned Government Pleader, the petitioner may be given liberty to challenge the same. Therefore, the contempt case is closed with liberty to the petitioner to challenge the Government Order dated 07.08.2013, if so advised.

Sd/- T.R.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR, JUDGE vs