Valsala M.D v. Dr.N.Jayadevan
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P.N.RAVINDRAN WEDNESDAY, THE 11TH DAY OF MARCH 2015/20TH PHALGUNA, 1936 Con.Case(C).No. 955 of 2014 (S) IN WP(C).6041/2014 ---------------------------------------------------- AGAINST THE ORDER/JUDGMENT IN WP(C) 6041/2014 of HIGH COURT OF KERALA DATED 23-06-2014 PETITIONER/PETITIONER:
---------------------- VALSALA M.D., AGED 52 YEARS W/O.K.P SASIKUMAR, DISTRICT PROJECT CO-ORDINATOR DISTRICT LITERACY MISSION, KOZHIKODE(RESIDING AT THANAL, CHEVARAMBALAM P.O KOZHIKODE 673 017) BY ADV. SRI.P.C.SASIDHARAN RESPONDENT/RESPONDENT NO.2:
---------------------------- DR.N.JAYADEVAN AGE AND FATHER'S NAME NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER THE DIRECTOR THE KERALA STATE LITERACY MISSION AUTHORITY GANDHARI AMMAN KOVIL STREET, PUTHENCHANDAYIL THIRUVANANTHAPURAM - 695 001 BY SRI.V.A.MUHAMMED THIS CONTEMPT OF COURT CASE (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 11-03-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
Con.Case(C).No. 955 of 2014 APPENDIX PETITIONER'S ANNEXURES:
ANNEXURE A-1:
CERTIFIED COPY OF THE JUDGMENT IN WPC NO.6041 OF 2014 DATED 23.6.2014.
RESPONDENT'S ANNEXURES: NIL /TRUE COPY/ P.A. TO JUDGE VPV
P.N.RAVINDRAN, J.
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= C.O.(C)No.955 of 2014 =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= Dated this the 11th day of March, 2015
JUDGMENT
This Contempt Case is filed alleging that the respondent herein, who is the Director of Kerala State Literacy Mission Authority has willfully disobeyed Annexure-A1 judgment delivered by this Court on 23.6.2014 in W.P.(C)No.6041 of 2014.
2. When the Contempt Case came up for hearing today, the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that the direction issued by this Court has been complied with and the petitioner has been transferred to Kozhikode and the third respondent in W.P.(C)No.6041 of 2014 has been transferred to Palakkad subject to the outcome of W.A.No.1307 of 2014 filed by the respondents in the writ petition. In such circumstances, as Annexure-A1 judgment has been complied with subject to the outcome of a writ appeal filed against the said judgment, I find no grounds to proceed further with the Contempt Case. It is accordingly closed reserving liberty with the petitioner to move afresh if occasion arises after the disposal of W.A.No.1307 of 2014. Sd/- P.N.RAVINDRAN JUDGE vpv