Babeesh V.T v. Bhattacharyya

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE THURSDAY, THE 15TH DAY OF JANUARY 2015/25TH POUSHA, 1936 Con.Case(C).No. 1025 of 2014 (S) ------------------------------------------------- AGAINST THE JUDGMENT IN W.P.(C).NO.18090/2013, DATED 05-06-2014 ------------------ PETITIONER(S)/PETITIONERS 1,6 & 8 :

--------------------------------------------------------

1. BABEESH V.T, AGED 25 YEARS, S/O.NARAYANAN, VAZHOTH THARAMAL HOUSE, KARAYAD P.O, MEPPAYUR, CALICUT- 673 524.

2. SHIJULAL.M, AGED 22 YEARS, S/O.BABU, KORANKANDI MEETHAL HOUSE, PERAMBRA P.O, CALICUT- 673 525.

3. SRIJEESH.M.K, AGED 26 YEARS, S/O.SREEDHARAN, MUNDIADIKUNI HOUSE, MUCHUKUNNU P.O, KOYILANDY, KOZHIKODE- 673 307.

BY ADVS.SRI.SIJU KAMALASANAN SMT.BINDU GEORGE RESPONDENT(S)/RESPONDENTS 1 TO 3 :

--------------------------------------------------

1. BHATTACHARYYA, (AGE AND FATHER'S NAME NOT KNWON TO THE PETITIONER), CHAIRMAN, STAFF SELECTION COMMISSION, BLOCK NO.12, CGO COMPLEX, LODHI ROAD, NEW DELHI- 110 003.

2. S.GOPALAN, (AGE AND FATHER'S NAME NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER), REGIONAL DIRECTOR, STAFF SELECTION COMMISSION, KARNATA-KERALA REGION, 1ST FLOOR, E WING, KENDRIYA SELECTION, BANGALORE-560 034.

3. SHRI ANIL GOSWAMI I.A.S, (AGE AND FATHER'S NAME IS NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER), SECRETARY, MINISTRY OF HOME, NORTH BLOCK, CENTRAL SECRETARIAT, NEW DELHI- 110 001.

BY ADV. SRI.T.SANJAY, CGC THIS CONTEMPT OF COURT CASE (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 15-01-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: Msd.

Con.Case(C).No. 1025 of 2014 (S) ------------------------------------------------- APPENDIX PETITIONER(S)' ANNEXURES :

ANNEXURE 1:

THE CERTIFIED COPY OF THE JUDGMENT DATED 05.06.2014 IN W.P.(C).NO.18090/2013.

RESPONDENT(S)' ANNEXURES :

NIL //TRUE COPY// P.A.TO JUDGE.

Msd.

A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE, J.

***************************************************** Contempt Case (C) No.1025 of 2014 ***************************************************** Dated this the 15th day of January, 2015

JUDGMENT

In view of the directions of the Division Bench judgment in W.A.No.1433/2014, the Contempt Case is closed with liberty to reopen the contempt based on challenge against the judgment passed in the Writ Appeal.

Accordingly, the Contempt Case is closed.

Sd/- A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE, JUDGE ln