High Court of KeralaCon.Case(C)/1116/2014closed

Muhammed Farook v. Biju

2015-09-09Honourable Mr.Justice P.R.Ramachandra Menon3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P.R.RAMACHANDRA MENON FRIDAY, THE 7TH DAY OF NOVEMBER 2014/16TH KARTHIKA, 1936 Con.Case(C).No. 1116 of 2014 (S) ------------------------------------------- WP(C) 10274/2013 of THIS HONOURABLE COURT, ERNAKULAM -------------- NAME AND ADDRESS OF THE PETITIONER :

-------------------------------------------------------------- MUHAMMED FAROOK, AGED 43 YEARS, S/O.PALLIYALI VALIYAVEETTIL USMAN, P.O.VATTALUR, KARINCHAPPADY, PERINTHALMANNA TALUK, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT.

BY ADV. SRI.K.SHIBILI NAHA NAME AND ADDRESS OF THE RESPONDENT/2ND RESPONDENT: -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- BIJU, AGE NOT KNOWNTOT EH PETITIOENR S/O. KRISHNANKUTTY, DISTRICT COLLECTOR, MALAPPURAM - PIN - 673 001.

BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI. GIKKU JACOB THIS CONTEMPT OF COURT CASE (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 07-11-2014, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

Con.Case(C).No. 1116 of 2014 (S) APPENDIX PETITIONER'S ANNEXURES :

ANNEXURE 1: COPY OF THE WPC NO. 10274/2013 DT 9/1/2014 OF THIS HON'BLE COURT.

ANNEXURE 2: COPY OF THE ORDER DT 23/3/2014 PASSED BY THE RESPONDENT. RESPONDENT'S ANNEXURES :

NIL.

//TRUE COPY// P.A. TO JUDGE bp

P.R. RAMACHANDRA MENON, J.

----------------------------------- Con. Case (Civil) No. 1116 of 2014 ------------------------------------------- Dated this the 7th day of November, 2014

J U D G M E N T

The learned Government Pleader appearing for the respondent submits that, the direction given by this Court as per Annexure-1 judgment has been complied with and appropriate orders have been passed on 02.11.2014, rejecting the claim put forth by the petitioner.

Under such circumstances, no further steps are necessary in this Contempt matter. Accordingly, it is closed, without prejudice to the rights and liberties of the petitioner to challenge the order, if the same stands detrimental to the rights and interest of the petitioner.

Sd/- P.R. RAMACHANDRA MENON, JUDGE.