C.N Rajalakshmi v. Dr.K.K Sundaresan

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P.R.RAMACHANDRA MENON TUESDAY, THE 10TH DAY OF FEBRUARY 2015/21ST MAGHA, 1936 Con.Case (C).No.1165 of 2014 (S) ----------------------------------------------- (JUDGMENT DATED 2.9.2014 IN WP(C) 22718/2014). ......

PETITIONER:

------------------- SMT.C.N RAJALAKSHMI,AGED 51, W/O.THULASIDAS,HEAD OF DEPARTMENT, DEPARTMENT OF DANCE, KERALA KALAMANDALAM DEEMED UNIVERSITY VALLATHOL NAGAR P.O.,CHERUTHURUTHY, THRISSUR DISTRICT.

BY ADVS.SRI.M.R.VENUGOPAL SMT.DHANYA P.ASHOKAN RESPONDENT:

---------------------- DR.K.K.SUNDARESAN,AGED 52, S/O.NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER, RESIDING AT THEERTHAM,NEAR KERALA KALAMANDALAM, P.O.CHERUTHURUTHY,THE REGISTRAR, KERALA KALAMANDALAM DEEMED UNIVERSITY, CHERUTHURUTHY,THRISSUR DISTRICT,PIN-679 531.

R1 BY SRI.S.SUBHASH CHAND,S.C THIS CONTEMPT OF COURT CASE (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 10-02-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

pk

Con.Case (C).No.1165 of 2014 (S):

APPENDIX PETITIONER'S ANNEXURES:

ANNEXURE-I:CERTIFIED COPY OF JUDGMENT IN W.P(C) 22718/2014 DATED 2.9.2014.

ANNEXURE-II:TRUE COPY OF THE POSTAL ACKNOWLEDGMENT DATED 24.9.2014.

ANNEXURE-III:TRUE COPY OF THE COMPLAINT ALONG WITH COVERING LETTER.

ANNEXURE-IV:TRUE COPY OF THE REPLY DATED 7.10.2014 SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER.

RESPONDENT'S ANNEXURES:

ANNEXURE R1(a):TRUE COPY OF THE MINUTES OF THE 39TH MEETING OF THE EXECUTIVE BOARD OF THE UNIVERSITY HELD ON 3.9.2014. ANNEXURE R1(b):TRUE COPY OF THE SAID ORDER BEARING KKMDU/RGR/24/2014 DATED 14.11.2014 THUS PASSED BY THE VICE CHANCELLOR OF THE UNIVERSITY.

ANNEXURE R1(c):TRUE COPY OF THE MEMO OF CHARGES AND STATEMENT OF ALLEGATIONS BEARING KKMDU/RGR/24/2014 DATED 17.11.2014.

//TRUE COPY// P.S. TO JUDGE pk

P.R. RAMACHANDRA MENON J.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Cont. Case No. 1165 of 2014 against W.P.(C) No. 22718 of 2014 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Dated, this the 10th day of February, 2015

JUDGMENT

The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the direction contained in Annexure 1 judgment has been complied with by the respondent. In the said circumstances contempt matter is closed, as no further orders are called for.

Sd/- P. R. RAMACHANDRA MENON, (JUDGE) kmd