High Court of KeralaCon.Case(C)/1266/2014closed

C.S.Sanal v. Mahipal Yadav Ips

2015-01-08Honourable Mr.Justice K.Surendra Mohan3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.SURENDRA MOHAN THURSDAY, THE 8TH DAY OF JANUARY 2015/18TH POUSHA, 1936 Con.Case(C).No. 1266 of 2014 (S) IN WP(C).10043/2014 ------------------------------------------------------ AGAINST THE JUDGMENT IN WP(C) 10043/2014 of HIGH COURT OF KERALA DATED 03-07-2014 PETITIONER/PETITIONER:

------------------------------------------------ C.S.SANAL, S/O.LATE SANKARANARAYANAN, AGED 25 YEARS CHANGARAMPURATH HOUSE, PANAMUKU, NEDUPUZHA P.O. THRISSUR.

BY ADV. SRI.DEEPU THANKAN RESPONDENTS/RESPONDENTS:

----------------------------------------------

1. MAHIPAL YADAV IPS, S/O. NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER, AGED NOT KNOWN THE MANAGING DIRECTOR KERALA STATE BEVERAGES (M&M) CORPORATION LTD. SASTHAMANGALAM, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM - 695 010.

2. SMT.K.R.GEETHA KUMARI, D/O. NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER, AGED NOT KNOWN CHIEF WELFARE FUND INSPECTOR KERALA ABKARI WORKERS WELFARE FUND BOARD THIRUVANANTHAPURAM - 695 001 R1 BY ADV. SRI.C.S.AJITH PRAKASH,SC,BEVERAGES CORPORATION R BY ADV.SRI.ROY CHACKO,SC,KERALA ABKARI WORKERS THIS CONTEMPT OF COURT CASE (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 08-01-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

Con.Case(C).No. 1266 of 2014 (S) IN WP(C).10043/2014 APPENDIX PETITIONER'S ANNEXURES :

ANNEXURE-A : COPY OF THE JUDGMENT OF THIS HON'BLE COURT IN WP(C).NO.10043 OF 2014 DATED 3/7/2014 ANNEXURE-B : COPY OF THE LETTER SEND TO THE 1ST RESPONDENT DATED 21/7/2014 ANNEXURE-C : COPY OF THE LETTER SEND TO THE 2ND RESPONDENT DATED 21/7/2014 RESPONDENT'S ANNEXURES : NIL /TRUE COPY/ P.A TO JUDGE AV

K.SURENDRA MOHAN, J.

------------------------------------ Cont.Case(C) No.1266 of 2014 ----------------------------------- Dated this the 8th day of January, 2015

J U D G M E N T

Adv.Sri.C.S.Ajith Prakash who appears for the 1st respondent submits that, the application of the petitioner has been forwarded to the 2nd respondent in compliance with the direction of this Court. Adv.Sri.Roy Chacko who appears for the 2nd respondent submits that, decision has already been taken to grant membership to the petitioner and that, the decision would be formally communicated to the petitioner shortly.

Since the direction of this Court has already been complied with, this contempt case is closed recording the submissions made by the counsel appearing for respondents 1 and 2.

Sd/- K.SURENDRA MOHAN, JUDGE.