Minu.S.Nair v. Gopinathan

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C.T.RAVIKUMAR TUESDAY, THE 26TH DAY OF MAY 2015/5TH JYAISHTA, 1937 Con.Case(C).No. 1283 of 2014 (S) IN WP(C).15035/2014 ------------------------------------------------------ AGAINST THE JUDGMENT IN WP(C) 15035/2014 of HIGH COURT OF KERALA DATED 29-08-2014 PETITIONER(S)/PETITIONER IN WPC:

---------------------------------------- MINU.S.NAIR, AGED 32 YEARS W/O.VINOD, CHANDRAMANGALAM, KATTAKADA THIRUVANANTHAPURAM DISTRICT.

BY ADV. SRI.M.DINESH RESPONDENT(S)/2nd RESPONDENT IN THE WPC:

-------------------------------------------------------- GOPINATHAN, AGED 50 YEARS FATHER'S NAME OF THE RESPONDENT NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER WORKING AS THE SECRETARY, POOVACHAL GRAMA PANCHAYAT POOVACHAL, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695575.

BY ADV. SRI.R.T.PRADEEP THIS CONTEMPT OF COURT CASE (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 26-05-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

C.O.(C).1283/14 APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS:

ANNEXURE A1:CERTIFIED COPY OF THE JUDGMENT DATED 29.8.2014 IN W.P.(C). 15035/2014 OF THIS HON'BLE COURT.

ANNEXURE A2:TRUE COPY OF THE RECEIPT ISSUED BY THE OFFICE OF THIS RESPONDENT DATED 29.9.2014.

RESPONDENT'S EXHIBITS:NIL //TRUE COPY// P.A.TO JUDGE

C.T.RAVIKUMAR, J.

======================== C.O.(C).No.1283 OF 2014 ======================== Dated this the 26th day of May, 2015

JUDGMENT

It is alleging wilful disobedience with the directions of this Court in judgment dated 29.8.2014 in W.P.(C).No.15035 of 2014 that this contempt case has been filed. A statement has been filed by the respondent. Along with the same, order dated 05.01.2015 passed by the respondent has been produced. A perusal of the said order would reveal that the same was passed in compliance with the directions in the aforesaid judgment. In such circumstances, taking note of the fact that the respondent has complied with the directions of this Court and passed orders, this contempt case is closed. It is made clear that in case the petitioner is aggrieved by the said order, it will be open to him to challenge the same, in accordance with law. Sd/- C.T.RAVIKUMAR Judge spc