Sreejesh Kumar.C.C v. P.Sadanandan

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.V.RAMAKRISHNA PILLAI WEDNESDAY, THE 28TH DAY OF JANUARY 2015/8TH MAGHA, 1936 Con.Case(C).No. 1297 of 2014 () IN WP(C).19709/2014 ----------------------------------------------------- AGAINST THE ORDER/JUDGMENT IN WP(C) 19707/2014 of HIGH COURT OF KERALA DATED 01-08-2014 PETITIONER:-:

------------------------ SREEJESH KUMAR.C.C., AGED 35 YEARS S/O.ACHUTHAN NAMBIAR, SANTHI VIHAR, PADANNOTTU METTA KANNUR DISTRICT.

BY ADVS.SRI.K.C.SANTHOSHKUMAR SMT.K.K.CHANDRALEKHA RESPONDENT(S)/RESPONDENT NO.2:-:

---------------------------------------------------------------- P.SADANANDAN,(AGE AND FATHER'S NAME NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER.) SECRETARY, MUNDERI GRAMA PANCHAYATH, KUDUKKIMOTTA KANNUR - 670 591.

R. BY ADV. SRI.P.U.SHAILAJAN THIS CONTEMPT OF COURT CASE (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 28-01-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

Con.Case(C).No. 1297 of 2014 () IN WP(C).19709/2014 ---------------------------------------------- PETITIONERS ANNEXURES ANNEXURE A COPY OF THE JUDGMENT DATED 1-8-2014 IN W.P.C. NO. 19707/2014 ANNEXURE B COPY OF THE ACKNOWLEDGEMENT CARD DATED 22-8-2014 ANNEXURE C COPY OF THE NOTICE DATED 1-9-2014 ISSUED BY THE RESPONDENT ANNEXURE D COPY OF THE MINUTES MADE AVAILABLE TO THE PETITIONER.

RESPONDENTS ANNEXURES ANNEXURE R1(a) COPY OF THE DECISION TAKEN BY THE PANCHAYATH COMMITTEE , MUNDERI GRAMA PANCHAYATH DATED 30-9-2014 ANNEXURE R1(b) COPY OF THE ORDER PASSED BY THE RESPONDENT DATED 21-1-2015 IN THE COMPLAINT SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER TRUE COPY P.A TO JUDGE SMM

A.V.RAMAKRISHNA PILLAI,J ................................................. . C.O(C). No.1297 of 2014 .............................................. Dated this the 28th day of January,2015.

J U D G M E N T

The petitioner has come up before this court alleging that the respondent has not complied with the directions in the judgment. A detailed counter affidavit has been filed by the Secretary of the respondent Panchayath. Along with the counter affidavit the respondent has appended Ext.R1 (b) which is the final decision taken by the Secretary of the Panchayath.

As there is substantial compliance the Contempt Case is closed. However it shall be open to the petitioner to challenge Ext.R1(b) if he is really aggrieved by it taking up all the contentions available to the petitioner. A.V.RAMAKRISHNA PILLAI, JUDGE smm