Mathai John v. Sri.N.Anilkumar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C.T.RAVIKUMAR MONDAY, THE 9TH DAY OF MARCH 2015/18TH PHALGUNA, 1936 Con.Case(C).No.1378 of 2014 (S) IN WP(C).14951/2014 ------------------------------------------------------ AGAINST THE ORDER IN WP(C) 14951/2014 of HIGH COURT OF KERALA DATED 17.6.2014 PETITIONER(S)/PETITIONER IN THE WPC:

---------------------------------------------- MATHAI JOHN, AGED 74 YEARS S/O.MATHAI, PAREKKUDIYIL HOUSE, MEENKUNNAM P.O. MUVATTUPUZHA, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT.

BY ADV. SRI.GEORGEKUTTY MATHEW RESPONDENT(S)/6TH RESPONDENT:

---------------------------------------- SRI.N.ANILKUMAR AGE & FATHER'S NAME NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER SECRETARY, ARAKKUZHA GRAMA PANCHAYATH, ARAKKUZHA MUVATTUPUZHA, PIN - 686 672.

BY ADV. SRI.REJI GEORGE BY ADV. SRI.UMESH.N.PAI BY SRI.JOBI JOSE KONDODY THIS CONTEMPT OF COURT CASE (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 09-03-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

C.O.(C).No. 1378 of 2014 APPENDIX PETITIONER(S)' EXHIBITS:

----------------------------- ANNEXURE I:CERTIFIED COPY OF THE INTERIM ORDER DATED 17.06.2014 PASSED BY THIS HON'BLE COURT IN W.P.(C).NO.14951/2014. ANNEXURE II:TRUE COPY OF THE PETITION DATED 29.09.2014 SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE RESPONDENT, ALONG WITH THE RECEIPT.

ANNEXURE III:TRUE COPY OF THE APPLICATION DATED 29.09.2014. ANNEXURE IV:TRUE COPY OF THE REPLY DATED 17.10.2014. RESPONDENT(S)' EXHIBITS:

------------------------------- ANNEXURE R1(A):A TRUE COPY OF THE APPLICATION DATED 2.12.2011 SUBMITTED BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT.

ANNEXURE R1(B):A TRUE COPY OF THE NOTICE DATED 15.01.2015 ISSUED TO THE 2ND RESPONDENT.

//TRUE COPY// P.A.TO JUDGE

C.T.RAVIKUMAR, J.

======================== C.O.(C).No.1378 OF 2014 ======================== Dated this the 9th day of March, 2015

JUDGMENT

It is alleging wilful disobedience with the directions of this Court in the order dated 17.6.2014 in W.P.(C).No.14951 of 2014 that this contempt case has been filed. When this matter is taken up for consideration, the learned counsel on both sides submitted that the direction in the aforesaid order has been complied with. Recording the said submission, this contempt case is closed. Sd/- C.T.RAVIKUMAR Judge spc