Sudheesh Das v. Anil Kumar Agarwal

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.K.JAYASANKARAN NAMBIAR FRIDAY, THE 16TH DAY OF JANUARY 2015/26TH POUSHA, 1936 Con.Case(C).No. 1401 of 2014 (S) ------------------------------------------------ THE JUDGMENT IN WP(C).NO.21928/2014 DATED 19/09/2014. .......

PETITIONER/PETITIONER IN WP(C).:

----------------------------------------------------- SUDHEESH DAS, S/O.M.P. DASAKUMAR, AGED 19 YEARS, RESIDING AT SURYA, KURATTIKKAD, MANNAR P.O., ALAPPUZHA - 689 622.

BY ADVS.SRI.M.R.HARIRAJ.

SMT.VINEETHA B.

RESPONDENTS/RESPONDENTS IN WP(C).:

---------------------------------------------------------------

1. ANIL KUMAR AGARWAL, FATHER'S NAME AND AGE NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER, DIRECTOR GENERAL, EMPLOYEES STATE INSURANCE CORPORATION, PANCHDEEP BHAWAN, COMRADE INDERJEET GUPTA (CIG) MARG, NEW DELHI - 110 002.

2. RANBIR BHOAT, FATHER'S NAME AND AGE NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER, THE DEPUTY MEDICAL COMMISSIONER, MEDICAL EDUCATION, ESI CORPORATION, PANCHDEEP BHAWAN, COMRADE INDRAJEET GUPA (CIG) MARG, NEW DELHI - 110 002.

3. J.H. NAYAK, FATHER'S NAME AND AGE NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER, MEDICAL DIRECTOR, ESI CORPORATION, PANCHDEEP BHAVAN, COMRADE INDERJEET GUPTA (CIG) MARG, NEW DELHI- 110 002.

4. SRIHOORTHU, FATHER'S NAME AND AGE NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER, REGIONAL DIRECTOR, ESI CORPORATION, SUB REGIONAL OFFICE, KOLLAM- 680 020.

BY ADV. SRI.P.SANKARANKUTTY NAIR, SC.

THIS CONTEMPT OF COURT CASE (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 16-01-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: rs.

Con.Case(C).No. 1401 of 2014 (S) APPENDIX PETITIONER'S ANNEXURES:- ANNEXURE A1 COPY OF THE ALLOTMENT MEMO NO.17988 ISSUED BY THE CHAIRMAN COUNSELLING COMMITTEE.

ANNEXURE A2 COPY OF THE DEMAND DRAFT DATED 05/09/2014.

RESPONDENT'S ANNEXURES:- NIL.

//TRUE COPY// P.A. TO JUDGE rs.

A.K.JAYASANKARAN NAMBIAR, J.

................................................. Cont.Case (C) No. 1401 of 2014 (S) ............................................... Dated this the 16th day of January, 2015

JUDGMENT

The learned counsel for the respondents submits that, pursuant to the dismissal of the S.L.P by the Supreme Court, instructions have been given to admit the petitioner and accordingly, the direction of this Court in the judgment dated 19.09.2014 in W.P. (C) No.21928 of 2014 has been complied with. Recording the said submission, the contempt of court case is closed. Sd/- A.K.JAYASANKARAN NAMBIAR JUDGE AMV/16/01/